Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 5 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
Yes it would ease the issue, because it would appeal those of the religious community that don't want to deny legal rights and responsibilities to gay couples, but can't reconcile gay marriage with their religious beliefs. However the better question is if easing the issue was the point? 8 years ago I would say that the anti gay marriage stance was just going to push domestic partnerships to the forefront. However now that several states have gay marriage, I think it is better to support that effort for all states, even if it doesn't ease the issue.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |