Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Lucky_Miss
| Reward Points: | 1 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 1 |
| Debates: | 0 |
I would like to agree with your opinion, however I would like to point out that you did not include one thing.
It is exactly because of Chamberlain's appeasement policy that Germany grew stronger and caused the amount of damage it did during World War II. An example is the surrender of Sudetenland (and eventually Czechoslovakia) to Germany, and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement. This area gave Germany many modern weapons stored there and also many Germans who would join the army, contributing even more to the rearmament of Germany. As someone mentioned, even at the end appeasement was a failure as it ended up with war.
However, due to appeasement, the citizens did get more prepared for war. They knew that they had tried everything to stop war and the only thing left was to fight, which united the country to fight and defend the nation. The extra 6 months provided because of the appeasement policy allowed not just Britain but other Allied countries to prepare for war. The overall effect of the appeasement policy would be that they would fare better in the war.
|
||||||||||
