- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
You DO understand, as a free speech advocate, that if free speech is denied to some, it's denied to all.
Just think upon how much stronger your statement gets when you realize free speech was denied to a media outlet (The New York Post) and the sitting President of the United States (Trump). If they can silence them, just imagine what they can do to you.
Therefore, I can assume you SUPPORT Colin Kaepernick's free speech rights.
Of course. I also support a private company getting rid of him if he hurts their bottom line. Let us never deviate from remembering all of those private company, private property points you made earlier.
In New York City, where anti-Asian hate crime soared nearly nine-fold in 2020 over the year before, only two of the 20 people arrested last year in connection with these attacks were white, according to New York Police Department data analyzed by the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism. Eleven were African Americans, six were white Hispanics and one was a Black Hispanic.
I'm sure you believe that.. But it was Jim Crow that held black people in poverty for generations.
Didn't the Democrats create both Jim Crow Laws and the Great Society? You screwed them twice?
To point out that you mentioned it for years until a Democrat became President is very noteworthy and very telling. You could create a debate about why Biden is seperating brown families at the border, but you won't. The only way this can be is if it was never actually about the brown families when you complained before.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!