Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 3 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
I would say the use of most regulations for something as common use as guns should not be heavily regulated. Sure the 2nd amendment is up to a lot of interpretation nowadays because of the language, but the right for the individual person to have it is still a main part of it to stupidly otherwise try to ignore. Gun violence is certainly a main problem as it always will be,but there will always be one other person trying to kill somebody else. So sometimes it's in the person's power to defend himself or loved ones when the government can't all the time. So I believe guns will be around to stay for a while and guaranteed as well, but only to moderate regulation as is like background checks and not having them with hardcore convicts.
I am aware of the religious themes in trying to argue something like abortion here as for many zealots may do it. There is still some moral argument to be made here outside of what specific religions we have here. Such as the many rights to life as well even if not naturalized by a birth certificate. Rights should still be applied even for those that aren't, like immigrants here yet still deserve life or can we execute them?
I am not as completely heartless to outlaw it completely and there really are complications that can happen. Science is way too far behind still to try and define abstract concepts like sentience. Like it’s the after death concept where we can certainly see what happens to our bodies, but is there something like a soul where we pass on to an after life? Who’s to say when we’re fully alive yet when nobody remembers the exact moment they were alive in the womb. Nor will anybody’s definition be concrete yet, if it’s the exact moment we have a heartbeat or brain pulse nobody has a right to say. Another conversation I feel is to not take the father completely out of the equation if he wants to genuinely care for the child as well as possibly adoption should we make that whole system better. After all as it is now the father has to pay child support if he doesn't want the baby yet the mother does, so what about equality there? I truly do believe that there are good reasons to not want a child. But then the internet came and sped everything up to where society can’t handle it. Along with it came such a very many groups. I see women now that see abortion as a thing to play with now if they’ve had three abortions and are laughing about having another one. It really does make my blood boil even if I don’t want to. While I don’t want the few bad apples to ruin it for every women, it can’t be ignored either that there are some who take advantage of it. So depends on the person and the complications where I ethically find it wrong, but it is how society is and there really is some greater good.
|