Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
MexicanFood
| Reward Points: | 41 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 94% |
| Arguments: | 15 |
| Debates: | 7 |
if you, the right wing, can bring enough fire power to WIN on the battlefield
Just need enough fire power for targeted assassinations and hidden units that ambush anyone in the CCP who ever goes out alone.
Rednekia.
Most Conservatives aren't rednecks, so it's an ignorant statement.
Well, our government doesn't do that.. Unless you know something I don't
They funded "questionable research" in Wuhan. The American establishment probably funds this too and sees it as a backaround to get transplants for themselves, loved ones, and the highest bidder if needed.
Therefore, I feel safe in saying, that having AR-15's to use against the Chinese government is hardly better than having NO guns at all..
Unless you have a well regulated unnamed and unknown private militia and are willing to wear ski masks as you snipe every CCP soldier that dares to wander into the wrong areas. If you can't identify me, you can't report me to the CCP. If the CCP has no idea where the snipers are or who they even are, they are at a severe disadvantage at least in that regard.
There are genes involved in brain sexual differentiation, making the brain either male or female, that are active completely independently from hormones. Those are probably our two main contributions on knowing the objective sex of the subject
We've identified new molecular mechanisms of sex determination. In particular we've discovered genes, such as WNT4, that's female-specific and not present in males.
-Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com/
Face it. Your Nazi, church burning, Jew hating, book burning, ANTIFA Fuhrer was just like you on everything.
You didn't address that the Nazis killed Conservatives. You went to an unrelated point.
You also didn't address that the Conservatives viewed the Nazis as Socialists and were wary of them.
In his memoir, written in 1952, Franz von Papen recalls his appointment as German chancellor in mid-1932:
"On 26 May 1932 I received a telephone call from General von Schleicher who asked me to come to Berlin on an argent matter… He told me it was the President’s wish to form a cabinet of experts, independent of the political parties.
Bruning had insisted, so Schleicher told me. that he would never sit at the same table as the National Socialists.*
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/ appointment-of-franz-von-papen-1932/
You also didn't recognize Papen quitting his position after the Night of the Long Knives.
You've buried yourself even deeper in your quest to prove Hitler wasn't what he was.
Banned for retreating and admitting you were wrong rather than fighting back like a man.
Lieutenant-Colonel Franz Joseph Hermann Michael Maria von Papen zu Köningen
He belonged to the group of close advisers to president Paul von Hindenburg in the late Weimar Republic. It was largely Papen, believing that Hitler could be controlled once he was in the government, who persuaded Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as Chancellor in a cabinet not under Nazi Party domination. However, Papen and his allies were quickly marginalised by Hitler and he left the government after the Night of the Long Knives, during which some of his confidantes were killed by the Nazis.
While he feinted right, Hitler and Stalin were natural bedfellows. Hitler mimicked Lenin’s path to totalitarian tyranny, parlaying crises into power. Nazis despised Marxists not over ideology, but because they had betrayed Germany in World War I and Nazis found it unconscionable that German communists yielded fealty to Slavs in Moscow.
The National Socialist German Workers Party staged elaborate marches with uniformed workers calling one another “comrade” while toting tools the way soldiers shoulder rifles. The bright red Nazi flag symbolized socialism in a “classless, casteless” Germany (white represents Aryanism). Fascist central planning was not egalitarian, but it divvied up economic rewards very similarly to communism: party membership and partnering with the state.
Later, Marxists from the Frankfurt School popularized this prevailing sentiment. Theodor Adorno in The Authoritarian Personality devised the “F” scale to demean conservatives as latent fascists. The label “fascist” has subsequently meant anyone liberals seek to ostracize or discredit.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
