Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 1 |
Debates: | 0 |
It is true that the appeasement did not prevent the war from breaking out, however the appeasement did allow them to buy more time to rearm and have a stronger opposing army to oppose Germany. Having the time to rearm, there may be less casualties resulting from WW2 as compared to having no time to rearm at all. The people are sick of war, if Britain is to jump straight into war and without appeasement, Britain will lose the majority of the support from the British. Chamberlain did state that: "I cannot help feeling that if, after all, war had come upon us...record their readiness to serve their Country,where-ever or however their services could be more useful...". By signing the appeasement, not only they can buy more time to rearm, it will also gain support from the masses.
|