No. He's making a comparison that so far isn't apples to apples however it's not homophobic. Children of incestuous unions often are at a disadvantage, often born with a deformity or learning disability. Putting aside personal disgust to it, there is a major drawback for such a union that is not present for gay marriage.

Yup! No matter what you tell him he only believes what he wants to believe about a person. If something or someone doesn't fit in his preconceived notions or meet his agenda, he lies about it.

But really...anyone with an iota of common sense recognizes he's only coming here to preach what he believes.

It's really isn't a debate. If two people love each other and are consensual, they should be allowed to marry. I would add a stipulation that the marriage officiant agrees to it but that's pretty much a given.

I could and I did. Try reading again.

Maybe Jeebus wouldn't even have been persecuted if he lived in the modern good 'ol USA .. unless he was Middle Eastern of course (which he was) .. and Brown (which we was) .. and spoke some foreign Aramaic language (which he did) ... and believed in some radical form of collective charity (which he did) ... and preached resistance toward the status quo for the benefit of the poor (which he did) ... and was an emigre from his own country (which he was)

Solid.

There are too many factors to consider. Why did someone learn poorly? Was it poor teaching? Where they just unable to understand it? Did they not put forth the effort? If they did bad in one class but great in another, would that still constitute learning poorly?

Of course not.

It's adorable that you think that was a rant. Exactly what part of what I wrote was confusing to you? Just some of it? Or all of it?

Honestly you should worry more about the way you interpret things instead of what the Muslims do.

Sure you can be Muslim as well. And Hindu, Buddist, Zoroastrianist....whatever.