CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS Mint_tea

Reward Points:4102
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
92%
Arguments:5317
Debates:43
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

No. He's making a comparison that so far isn't apples to apples however it's not homophobic. Children of incestuous unions often are at a disadvantage, often born with a deformity or learning disability. Putting aside personal disgust to it, there is a major drawback for such a union that is not present for gay marriage.

2 points

Yup! No matter what you tell him he only believes what he wants to believe about a person. If something or someone doesn't fit in his preconceived notions or meet his agenda, he lies about it.

But really...anyone with an iota of common sense recognizes he's only coming here to preach what he believes.

1 point

It's really isn't a debate. If two people love each other and are consensual, they should be allowed to marry. I would add a stipulation that the marriage officiant agrees to it but that's pretty much a given.

1 point

I could and I did. Try reading again.

1 point

Maybe Jeebus wouldn't even have been persecuted if he lived in the modern good 'ol USA .. unless he was Middle Eastern of course (which he was) .. and Brown (which we was) .. and spoke some foreign Aramaic language (which he did) ... and believed in some radical form of collective charity (which he did) ... and preached resistance toward the status quo for the benefit of the poor (which he did) ... and was an emigre from his own country (which he was)

Solid.

1 point

There are too many factors to consider. Why did someone learn poorly? Was it poor teaching? Where they just unable to understand it? Did they not put forth the effort? If they did bad in one class but great in another, would that still constitute learning poorly?

1 point

Of course not.

Mint_tea(4102) Clarified
1 point

It's adorable that you think that was a rant. Exactly what part of what I wrote was confusing to you? Just some of it? Or all of it?

Mint_tea(4102) Clarified
1 point

Honestly you should worry more about the way you interpret things instead of what the Muslims do.

Mint_tea(4102) Clarified
1 point

Sure you can be Muslim as well. And Hindu, Buddist, Zoroastrianist....whatever.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Do you know what two consenting adults of sound mind, means?
Winning Position: No way in hell.
Winning Position: Yes, it should be.
Winning Position: 50% works.
Winning Position: She sang the lyrics.

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Lady
Marital Status: Married
Political Party: Other
Country: United States

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here