CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic


RSS ModerateJew

Reward Points:53
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
61%
Arguments:25
Debates:11
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
0 points

He has no common sense or the ability to self reflect. It's why he says so many stupid and contradictory things on a daily basis.

0 points

You didn't list anything, which means you don't have anything. That's what I thought. You didn't address my list of things you need to explain. Do you have no answers? Okay. That's what I thought, so you proved my inclination right.

1 point

You didn't actually provide a link. So now that the site knows you deliberately post fake news without a link, no one will be able to read anything you say with credibility. That doesn't bode well for you on a debate site.

1 point

Then give me examples of Trump being like Hitler, and not something a left wing politician has already done.

Next, explain how the left's lockdowns, unless it's their party is not Fascist. Explain how burning down churches and black businesses is not Fascist. Explain how having one race bow to another is not Fascist.

0 points

anybody who ever supported Trump, voted for Trump or worst of all, WORKED for Trump is forever tainted.

The old Nazi mindset of turning anyone who doesn't bend the knee to your viewpoint must be essentially like a lepper.

I'd also include those who were in a position where they could have spoken out against Trump and didn't as complicit.

I looked through your posts. You never once condemned black cops being killed by white rioters or left wing state and city governments arresting mothers for the crime of going to the park with their child.

Anybody I consider letting into my life from here on out is going to have to pass a Trump test. I'm gonna want to know if they were ever on the Trump crazy train and if they were I could never trust them.

You would have burned someone as a witch in 1676 wouldn't ya Rusticus?

I don't want anything to do with anybody who is so mentally deficient that they could have ever looked at Donald Trump and thought he was ok.

I personally don't want anything to do with someone who would condemn you for supporting the same free market that lifted more people out of poverty than Socialism, that is, assuming they act as psychopathic as you about it.

That being said, it's clear now that Trump has at long last shit the bed. Soon even the stupidest most demented Trumplings will pretend they never supported him.

The only way they'd be scared to express their viewpoint is if the person they were addressing was a control freak psychopath.

They'll abandon Trump and wait for the next Reich wing

Left wing VOX said he was a moderate. Mostly because your attempt to label him a Nazi has no proof, and you won't be showing us any evidence of anything a Democrat hasn't done before.

crazy train to come along and jump on board. The Republican party itself is tainted

Your party literally is burning down black residential areas, destroying black businesses, and demanding white people wash the feet of minorities while chanting phrases where they demean themselves.

They also demanded the arrest of surfers, skate boarders, mothers, and barbers because "you don't have the right to infect others". Then they hit the streets in mobs like maniacs.

I also saw video of left wing rioters who were at an event called "Abolish the police" who were almost run over by a car and then called the police to report it. Let that sink in.

ModerateJew(53) Clarified
1 point

Mitt Romney's money traces back to Communist China.

1 point

Here a left wing outlet trying to run cover for the Obama administration and the intelligence agencies.

The article:

"Surveillance of Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. revealed he had interacted with an unnamed American who may have been undercutting efforts to pressure Vladimir Putin’s government."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/qanda-what-does-unmasking-someone-in-an- intel-report-mean/2020/05/13/8c1cd578-9578-11ea-87a3-22d324235636 story.html?outputType=amp

Reality: They know the casual reader won't catch that the system Iis set up to spy on foreign entities, not Americans, and that Flynn was "unmasked" while doing surveillance on a foreign entity. In other words, they hid behind the claim that they were doing surveillance on Russia, and Flynn just "coincidentally" happened to be on the other end of that call. Evidence is pointing towards them targeting him, which is illegal, rather than a foreign entity and him being caught up in foreign surveillance.

Also, the leaking of this classified information to the Washington Post was and is a felony.

1 point

As for Michael Flynn, they don't know who is being unmasked. The media are playing word games to deceive those not familiar with the process. For example, "unmasking isn't insidious or abnormal", knowing those making claims aren't making THAT claim.

The odds that they miraculously unmasked Michael Flynn on a call where we are shown no transcript evidence of nefarious dealings is astronomical. Occum's Razor. They knowingly targeted Flynn and not an unknown person innocently and randomly.

0 points

Warrants to Spy on Trump Campaign Lacked Probable Cause, DOJ Admits

The Inspector General’s Report

The wheels came off the Trump-Russia collusion bus in December, when the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General published a report titled “Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation.”

Michael Horowitz, the inspector general of the Justice Department, testifying before Congress, laid bare the gross deficiencies in the FBI’s investigation. Horowitz noted seven significant inaccuracies and omissions, as we wrote about here.

Horowitz’s report got the attention of the FISA court.

Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, presiding judge at the time, entered an order Dec. 17. Collyer directed that “the government shall, no later than January 10, 2020, inform the [court] in a sworn written submission of what it has done, and plans to do, to ensure that the statement of facts in each FBI application accurately and completely reflects information possessed by the FBI that is material to any issue presented by the application.”

That’s strong stuff coming from the FISA court, especially since the rebuke was public.

On Jan. 7, the new presiding judge, James “Jeb” E. Boasberg, entered another order “regarding the handling and disposition of information,” seeking detailed information about how the government planned to handle sensitive matters before the court in the future.

Boasberg noted that the court had received notice of “material misstatements and omissions” in the third and fourth FISA applications against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

Boasberg’s order referred to a letter sent to the court by the Justice Department on Dec. 9, which contained the following statement: “DOJ assesses that with respect to the applications in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679, ‘if not earlier, there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause to believe that Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power.’”

But Boasberg’s order contained another interesting statement.

The judge wrote that “the Government apparently does not take a position on the validity of the authorizations in [the first and second FISA warrant applications regarding Page, but intends to sequester information acquired pursuant to those dockets in the same manner as information acquired pursuant to subsequent dockets.”

In nonlawyer speak, that means the government isn’t using any of the evidence it may have gotten as a result of spying on Page based on any of the four FISA warrants.

Who Signed Off on FISA Warrants

Under the applicable rules, FISA warrant applications must be signed by senior Justice Department officials. With respect to the warrants to spy on Page, the first application in October 2016 was signed by then-FBI Director James Comey and then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. Collyer approved the application.

The second application in January 2017 also was signed by Comey and Yates. Judge Michael Mosman approved the application.

The third application in April 2017 was signed by Comey and then-acting Attorney General Dana Boente. Judge Anne Conway approved the application.

Finally, the fourth application in June 2017 was signed by then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The application was approved by Judge Raymond Dearie.

The Justice Department responded to Collyer’s order with a 15-page filing Jan. 10. The response explains the FBI’s accuracy procedures in the context of applying for a FISA warrant, as well as the historical guidance provided to agents in the Justice Department’s National Security Division (who appear before the FISA court).

https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/warrants-spy-trump-campaign-lacked-probable-cause-doj-admits

0 points

And when new information refutes it, just pretend it never happened, and keep repeating:

Yes, that's the left's tactic every time one of their lies in proven to be false. And earlier the FDA, France and the WHO were touting it. That's why Al provided no timeline of who said what, and when.

And as usual, if you search through left wing smear attempts, you will always find where they tell the truth late in the article in order to protect themselves from being sued for libel.

Your link, and I quote:

Studies published on this website have not been peer reviewed.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here