Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 27 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 97% |
Arguments: | 13 |
Debates: | 3 |
He never used force. He used the appearance of force, which is different. Threatening to dump someone is a lot different than actually doing it. That whole event actually did end in a compromise. Plus, you could easily argue that the United States is stronger as united states than individual states, so it was important for Jackson to keep them together. Lincoln kept us together, and I don't see any debate about him (yet).
Well, what's the job of the government? To do what the people want, or to do what they think is best for the people? It's a [representative] democracy, so the answer to that should be easy. Once the government thinks its job is to tell us what's best for us, we're effectively North Korea...
When we think about historical figures, we should consider the society they lived in and were raised in. Saying people were "bad" because they owned slaves or wanted to remove Native Americans in the 1800s is like calling a person in India "stupid" because they don't speak English. People's knowledge and beliefs are a result of their upbringings and the society they live in. Right and wrong aren't always clear cut, especially in a historical lens.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |