Click the link below and see your "bunch of cells" at a mere 12 weeks old.

I don't even want pedophiles out of prison, and I'm not sorry about it. Protection of our children is one of our races greatest responsibilities. I'm glad that we agree on that.

I'm not sure about your laws there, but here pedophilia is outlawed. Therefore, pedophiles try to hide their perverted behavior behind clothes. In fact pedophiles hiding behind the clerical robes has been a real problem in this country.

The people who would go naked are those that are comfortable being nude while living their lives. There might be a few exhibitionists that are sexually excited by showing off but they would soon be ostracized by their communities as they are currently at nude venues across the country.

You do understand that the government forcing everyone wear clothes is an infringement on freedom? By removing that infringement you are increasing freedom. No one is suggesting that clothes be outlawed, only that the freedom to choose not wear clothes be applied. Everyone that wants to wear them would still be allowed to. So, that any enforcement would be removed.

Let me reiterate, repealing laws against nudity is not forcing others to go naked. Are you actually following the line of thought here?

The idea of not wearing clothes in public is quite reasonable. Clothes are uncomfortable, and unnecessary in pleasant weather or in pleasantly air conditioned indoor spaces. You have yet to give any reason as to why they should be required.

Of course it is an injustice to tell people to wear clothes just because you like wearing them. For some reason you seem to think that any preference of yours should be enforced on others.

So, what you are saying is that we should all be free to live our lives as we see fit, with or with out clothes? Is that correct?

Then you do support allowing public nudity as long as it is not a law that everybody has to be nude. Is this what you are trying to say? If so, perhaps you should go up top and give a yes vote because that is all that question is about. Giving those that wish to be nude the freedom to do so.

They also help a lot when hunting or fishing and you are having to push through heavy brush. But otherwise I like to leave them off.

There are many nude resorts in Russia and from what I've heard there are nude beaches in Greenland. Even in Russia during the winter people could be quite comfortable naked in a well heated restaurant. But, again no one is talking about requiring anybody to be nude, only repealing the laws that require clothes. You seem to be having a hard time grasping that concept.

An argument that killing a human being is justified if that being has not reached a particular level of consciousness could then be used for killing those in a coma. I don't think that a consciousness argument is a valid one.

This makes absolutely no sense. As far as fashion goes any fashionable clothes of today will simply be the historical costumes of tomorrow.

Repealing laws that require all people to wear clothes in public would in no way create a law that requires people to be nude. The great majority of people would still wear clothes, so your unfair peer pressure would still be to remain clothed.

And remember, live life with courage and with passion, and above all think hard.

So, I guess that if I don't like looking at your ugly clothes I should have the right to require that take them off? If I don't like looking at your ugly face I should have the right to demand that you cover it up? Your argument that you don't like seeing someone's genitals therefore they should be required to cover them has no more validity.

Look you have the right to be offended by anything that you want. Just stop trying to use your silly prejudices as some god given right to repress others.