Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | -1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 86% |
Arguments: | 9 |
Debates: | 0 |
Although this could be considered racial profiling, he does have a point as in the aspect of birth certificate marking. Though this should be a decision made between the parents of the child. Whichever nationality they choose to be the primary, or they could just have the races listed in no particular order.
e.g.
Race: Hawaiian
Mexican
Since it did happen, as you stated above, as the tree hits the ground, the air around it must vibrate as a reaction to the violent collision between earth and the bark. Causing "sound"(The vibration of air) to occur.
Yes, it did make a sound. This is an age old philosophy question I know, but science proves it wrong.
Though, Quantum Physics would say that because there is no actual living thing to observe it, or experience it in any way, it doesn't happen at all. Meaning that there is no way the tree could have actually ever fallen in the first place. The theory of relativity would say the same thing, for since there is no way to experience it live and actually happening for any living being, it never happened.
Can we have a clarification of what evil is first and not have to explain what we believe it is? This topic is too broad to be discussed. There are groups of people who would believe that what you say is evil, is quite normal or something they need to do. This discussion is useless, it's too subjective and broad. Say something specific, such as "Should he acts of [Group X] be punished as to attempt to reform their ways?" With sides 1. Yes, they will discontinue their acts after being deterred by punishment; 2. No, it would not change the situation, but make the situation worse.
First of all, this a very subjective debate. This is more of a poll than a debate. There is no real argument to be found through "Do you think this or this is cooler". The question should be changed to "Which would [Population X] prefer more: Clean or Dirty/Blue/Blunt Comedy". The subject at matter has become something equal to a discussion of whether a penguin or panda is cooler.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |