Nevermind. I found the claim for myself at Politico. Politico quotes him as saying "this allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution."

When you go look at the post he said

"This allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution." referring to election fraud, mail in voting, ballot harvesting etc.

This is why we hate the media, don't listen to a fucking word they say and call them the enemy of the people. They can't go even one fucking day or minute without being completely full of shit. They know stupid people will buy the horse shit. Sadly it says more about you than them.

https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/109462304115605769

So show us video showing exactly what he said. Pardon me if I don't just accept what a media known for being completely full of shit narrated for you to believe like a lemming today.

The Republicans got five million more votes nationwide than Democrats and highly increased voting performance in every county in New York state. If reproduction were the topic of the day, none of that would be true. Plus there are no women on this site.

I'd be interested in seeing this slithering toad provide some evidence that God exists

You've been shown it many times on this site. You just get mad and begin calling people names because you're not smart enough to counter that evidence. The fact that you are 40 and still do not act like an adult shows why you don't have the cognitive abilities to win a debate.

I find it interesting that you dislike feminazis but worship actual Nazis.

You're the only one on the site that worships national socialist parties and their leaders. In fact you promote it and defend Farakhan and the Nation of Islam. He quotes Hitler all of the time. That is cognitive dissonance and a lack of self awareness on levels I have never seen.

To clarify, you think that property damage constitutes a threat to a person? And that this further justifies threatening a person with lethal force and/or using potentially lethal force against a person?

What if the people beating on the car are shouting, "I'm gonna kill you!" and "kill that Nazi pig!" and they have you surrounded with hundreds of people who refuse to get out of your vehicle's path?

Wrong. You always have a right to self-defense

Oh, OK. In that case I have a right to defend myself against the threats you just made by shooting you in the face. Glad we got that sorted.

And then he'd he'd have the right to shoot you before you shot him. Maybe he should just use leftist logic and take you out with the pelting with nerf darts now just in case.

I would have to agree with bronto if he used violence to keep Ghandi from humping children. I'd have to disagree with you for defending the humping of children.

You are literally a fucking idiot mate.

What do you mean? You're dumber than a box of rocks, so what's your point?

You've spoiled this website for everybody.

You call everyone you disagree with a Nazi, or you attack their Jewishness and act like a Klansman.

Everything you ever type is stupid.

Stupid people think intelligent people are stupid. That means you.

In this great nation of ours where we have FREEDOM of religion, the government CANNOT tell us what a religion IS, nor can it tell us what a religion isn't.

Then there is no seperation of church and state because the government cannot define what a church is for us in the first place.