Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS PooPooFace

Reward Points:36
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

7 most recent arguments.
1 point

You supported procedures that bankrupted a third of businesses, and rather than own it, you reply uh, uh, uh, but pajama guy.

0 points

So says the guy who BELIEVES that Trump still IS the president, and he's going to save us from the lizard people, who fuck children and drink their blood.

Yeah, that guy.

No one believes that. You just tried, and not well, to avoid what you actually did, because lefties can't face when they support dumbass shit.

1 point

Because the British are the dumbest race on planet Earth.

PooPooFace(36) Clarified
0 points

I'm not concerned because that situation is no different to how reality has always been

AKA "I've always lived under Capitalism, am not concerned about it, but will gripe about Capitalism anyway as I try to put a system in place that may be worse because I lack basic common sense and have feelings and emotions I need to emote."

1 point

Can you tell me what the BLM platform is?

The founders are openly Communist, so whatever it takes to divide the populace against each other by race.

1 point

The fact that the postmodernists dare to be Marxists is also something that I find I would say not so much intellectually reprehensible as morally repugnant and one of the things that the post modernists, postmodern Neo Marxists continually claim is that they have nothing but compassion for the downtrodden. And I would say that anybody with more than a cursory knowledge of twentieth century history who dares to claim simultaneously that they have compassion for the downtrodden and that their Marxists are revealing either their ignorance of history. That’s so astounding that it’s actually a form of miracle or a kind of malevolence that’s so reprehensible that it’s almost unspeakable.

Because we already ran the equity experiment over the course of the century and we already know what the Marxist doctrines have done for oppressed people all around the world and the answer to that mostly was imprison them and enslave them, work them to death or execute them.

And as far as I can tell that’s not precisely commensurate with any message of compassion and so I don’t think that the postmodern Neo Marxists have a leg to stand on ethically or intellectually or emotionally.

And I think that they should be gone on after as hard as possible from an intellectual perspective, an informed intellectual perspective and this is fundamentally a war of ideas and that’s the level of analysis that it should be fought upon.

And not only is it a war of ideas, I think it’s one that can be won because I think that the especially the French intellectual post modernists are a pack of what would you call them, well we could start with charlatans and that’s a good one. Pseudo intellectual would be good, resentful would be another and then I would also consider them highly, they’re highly deceptive in their intellectual strategies because almost all of them were Marxists student intellectuals and they knew by the time the Gulag Archipelago came out and even before that the nightmares of the Soviet Union and Maoist China were of such magnitude that they had completely invalidated any claim to ethical justification that the fundamental Marxist doctrines had ever managed to manifest.

And so it’s a no-go zone as far as I’m concerned. Intellectually the game’s over. We’ve already figured out that there are finite constraints on interpretation and we also understand why those exist and how they evolved and from the perspective of political argumentation there’s absolutely no excuse whatsoever in the 21st century to put forth Marxist doctrines as if they’re the bomb that’s needed by the "compassionate" that’s administered to the downtrodden.

Sorry, tried that didn’t work. We’ve got a hundred million corpses to prove it and that’s plenty for me and if it’s not enough for you well then you should do some serious thinking either about your historical knowledge or about your moral character.

1 point

Lol. What? I like burritos so that makes me racist? Good one.

You're racist towards tacos. Do you not know that the hard shell with meat and salad within its loins matters?

Displaying 7 most recent debates.

Winning Position: I can save a penguin somewhere
Tied Positions: Rules 4 thee but not 4 me vs. Two faced at all times
Winning Position: Sounds like highfalutin
Tied Positions: Replace America with what? vs. That's right

About Me

I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here