Would you not take the strength of the U.S. military and weaponry over little old Iran?

Would you not take the strength of the U.S. military and infantry over any future plans of little Iran?

would you want somebody that has problems with America to have a steady access to nuclear weapons? Makes sense...

This deal limits the productivity of Iran's centrifuges. They are limited to few centrifuges along with the oldest and least efficient. This puts them at a vulnerable state. Through this the influence of surrounding areas can be hindered. This delays the time for the Middle East to establish powerful explosives.

The Deal is good because we are able to limit the power of Iran, so that they do not pose an imminent threat to Americans

It would be better for the nation, to have a one massive power than several mediocre powers. This would help the nation in becoming a global force, rather than a local force. At any point in time the country could be attacked by oppressors, ratifying the constitution would provide the power for the country to have the resources and structure to be able to collectively establish a force to compete with other radicals like Britain. etc.

In ratifying the constitution, the people could become more unified under one large central government. Differences are present throughout the people, but they could see similarities in that all people are created equal under the same rules, and structure of government. Improvements will need to be made, but those improvements could be made together. One person wont be able to see the changes that they want to be made, all people will have a say. Elites will be able to lead, elites are the ones who should be in power regardless, the best man, with the absence of wealth, should be able to represent.

Strong centralized government would help regulate all people, those people of the wealthier status would not be able to take advantage of others and abuse their power. "No man is allowed to be a judge of his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgement, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity." Those in charge will always make rules in their favor, if they have the chance, people who are powerful in general, want more power. Government should depend on structure not people, but should be based on popular sovereignty.