The speech its-self should not be controlled by laws. Words can hurt and cause feelings to be broken. Triggering is something what should be taken naturally and not forced for everyone to hear. For example if you talk about climate change and your peer gets triggered he/she should make the attack personal. That is where i draw the line. The line is drawled between two points 1) if the attack becomes personal and 2) if violence is encouraged or comes from speech. A personal attack would be ad hominem dictated towards the person. In other words a attack at the person about how they act, talk, look and others.My second point is simple if you encourage violence its no longer a hate speech but a order to do wrong acts. In the ideal world their would be no laws, but people would control each other even in hate speeches.

its like the Irish Potato Fame... kids cant get enough of them. Amazon and wall mart are making a fortunate off of kids who want one as a toy. The orbital cause was okay in helping kids with focus preambles....but now it has gone out of control will have people calling boxes of these on the side of the road. No matter where you turn you see one. They have not served their orniagl purpose any longer and instead are a distraction.

Thats why i underlined almost in what i wrote. The bible tells the men of the house hold to lead the wife. The wife must submit to her husband under the bible. If you follow this logic of reason. The male must be the religious leader, he must provide for her in means of war, and conflict. The men is the problem solver in the bible.The question does not infer to just the bible though. Women have bean leaders though out history what counters what your last point was. its simple as that.

Follow the money trial, many army, navy, airforce and others make a ton of money selling to the government what gives their product to the army and others. Many mercian contractors make money money then you could every inmagian selling into these useless wars. The only reason the Government gives us is to project and provide democracy. When in realtly its about the money the government makes.

As a conservative, i don't think Comey is bringing down the Democrats nor is he bringing down the Republicans. In Comey's last tesitonmy he gave answers what gave both sides the feel of winning. Comey and all the Media has caused a endless loop of bashing trump. Comey is taking down the American people more then he is taking down the Democrats. Lets face it the mass media will still use Comey to bash trump while conservative outlets will let it happen.

As a conservative, i don't think Comey is bringing down the Democrats nor is he bringing down the Republicans. In Comey's last tesitonmy he gave answers what gave both sides the feel of winning. Comey and all the Media has caused a endless loop of bashing trump. Comey is taking down the American people more then he is taking down the Democrats. Lets face it the mass media will still use Comey to bash trump while conservative outlets will let it happen.

superior is defined as higher in rank, status, or quality. I would first like to base my thoughts on where we are talking (place). If we are talking about the U.S or most of Europe, this superiority is based solely on feelings. A American women is sometimes payed less in STEM fields...but is that being treated lesser then men? Sometimes all it has to due with is how much off work women compared to men take. In 2011 men spent 37 hours at a paying job while women only spent 21. BUT taking are of kids and household duties were almost 3 times as much as men. In fact women have a lot of power over men. In almost every parent advice article it says "Your wife wears the pants" or "wife way or no way". No man should say NO! its my way. Men like to follow and do task, and a women makes for this leader.