Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 19 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 74% |
Arguments: | 21 |
Debates: | 0 |
For the sake of time I will make my number 1 point in; dependence and vulnerability. We have become too dependent on technology and the Y2K incident showed that even back then when computers weren't even in 50 percent of American households that we are way too dependent on our technology.
This has nothing to do about their actions. Listen, they will be confronted and dealt with in the end, not my problem. I do not want to control them from being together, I honestly don't care. However, they DO NOT get to claim the title of marriage and receive the benefits of marriage when there is no such a thing! http://www.merriam-webster.com/
It is not recognized by our constitution as a right. The end. And it won't get added. If a state wants to legalize it they can try.
Personally, I say don't legalize it nor make it illegal, that way it will not be legally recognized however a person can either deny or accept "ceremonially" performing a wedding for them.
This has nothing to do about their actions. Listen, they will be confronted and dealt with in the end, not my problem. I do not want to control them from being together, I honestly don't care. However, they DO NOT get to claim the title of marriage and receive the benefits of marriage when there is no such a thing! http://www.merriam-webster.com/
It is not recognized by our constitution as a right. The end. And it won't get added. If a state wants to legalize it they can try.
Personally, I say don't legalize it nor make it illegal, that way it will not be legally recognized however a person can either deny or accept "ceremonially" performing a wedding for them.
This has nothing to do about their actions. Listen, they will be confronted and dealt with in the end, not my problem. I do not want to control them from being together, I honestly don't care. However, they DO NOT get to claim the title of marriage and receive the benefits of marriage when there is no such a thing! http://www.merriam-webster.com/
It is not recognized by our constitution as a right. The end. And it won't get added. If a state wants to legalize it they can try.
Personally, I say don't legalize it nor make it illegal, that way it will not be legally recognized however a person can either deny or accept "ceremonially" performing a wedding for them.
This has nothing to do about their actions. Listen, they will be confronted and dealt with in the end, not my problem. I do not want to control them from being together, I honestly don't care. However, they DO NOT get to claim the title of marriage and receive the benefits of marriage when there is no such a thing! http://www.merriam-webster.com/
It is not recognized by our constitution as a right. The end. And it won't get added. If a state wants to legalize it they can try.
Personally, I say don't legalize it nor make it illegal, that way it will not be legally recognized however a person can either deny or accept "ceremonially" performing a wedding for them.
This has nothing to do about their actions. Listen, they will be confronted and dealt with in the end, not my problem. I do not want to control them from being together, I honestly don't care. However, they DO NOT get to claim the title of marriage and receive the benefits of marriage when there is no such a thing! http://www.merriam-webster.com/
It is not recognized by our constitution as a right. The end. And it won't get added. If a state wants to legalize it they can try.
Personally, I say don't legalize it nor make it illegal, that way it will not be legally recognized however a person can either deny or accept "ceremonially" performing a wedding for them.
No they don't have extra rights! Show me in the constitution where they do? Wait what? They don't? That's right! No they don't have extra rights and you are no practicing catholic because you are going against church doctrine. Course, the majority of Catholics in America are Hippocrates anyways!
There is no such thing as gay marriage just like there is no such thing as gay rights, everyone has the same rights no one has different rights than others. Marriage is defined as between a man and a woman, with one of the main purposes being to procreate and have children, once you take that ability away there is no way it can be a marriage. This does not include those who just can't have babies because of sperm count or medical reasons.
|