CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Raven01

Reward Points:10
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:18
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
2 points

I despise stupidity, that is as close to hate as you will get.

If you are so against any type of killing you had best be one of those granola chewing vegan that fail to recognize they too kill animals (in a slow painful way such as starvation) by causing habitat to be destroyed to feed their ill informed selves.

1 point

"While many criminals have guns illegally, certainly not most.

And for those who have them illegally, they get them from legal sources, most commonly gun shows."

Cite your source because I am calling BULLSHIT. you pulled those "facts" straight out of your ass.

Criminality and guns are not even linked. Switzerland requires every home to be armed (military grade weapons at that) and they have a very enviably low level of violence.

2 points

"Guns serve no real positive purpose in life other than to kill people "

Moron. Clearly you do not live near any dangerous animals, or gun ranges for that matter. There are many uses for guns which do not in any way shape or form involve killing people. YOU can try to negotiate with a bear, or a coyote eyeing your kids or a rabid wolf if you want, I'm going to shoot if they pose a threat and there is no safe haven for everyone in the area.

However, people are also killed with bat, knives, plastic bags, fists and feet, and even motor vehicles. Should we ban all of these things that you personally don't have a need for?

" if all guns were banned then using guns for protection (the purpose, I believe) would be unnecessary for whoever was causing you to defend yourself wouldn't have a gun either, and therefore you are less likely to be hurt as badly."

Okay, this is even dumber that the 1st quote.

Do you think for a minute a criminal gives a rat's ass about whether or not his gun is legal? Not to mention that anyone with metalworking ability can construct a functional zipgun in under 20 minutes with access to the right equipment and, these do not even have to rely on conventional bullets.

1 point

Sigh.

Then why do so many women take BCP for reasons OTHER than birth control?

Who said the several varieties of male pill that are being worked on will be damaging at all?

If it is not damaging to one of you but damaging to the other (assuming we are talking committed couples atm) would it not make more sense for more of that responsibility to fall to whoever it affects negatively the least?

2 points

Bet your iBrick does not beat my Droid.

You compared apples to oranges as it were.

Apple products are for kiddies and goofy wannabe cool hipsters.

BTW, depending on where I am my Droid dl's between 14-21 Mbps.

1 point

Capitalism has to win over socialism.

Because, socialists eventually always run out of "other peoples" money. Then it crumbles and no one remembers how to look after themselves.

Socialism=Peter Pan syndrome.

1 point

"Yeah, let's not provide birth control so you can all really complain when women are on welfare because they couldn't afford the child you forced them to have."

You are a complete fucktard, I have never forced anyone to have any child. Actually, as a guy I have to recognize that I have ZERO reproductive rights. Only reproductive responsibilities. The woman is the one that can choose to carry to term, give up for adoption (without knowledge or consent of the father) or abort.

Your statement is also insulting to any woman with half a brain and any sense of personal agency.

BCP's can be had for less than $60/year. Sure some are more expensive but if you are going to insist I have to pay for your choice you sure as hell don't get to pick what I am paying for.

If that amount is out of your league you should have bigger priorities than getting laid.

1 point

They should learn to suck dick better and spend more time looking for a job to pay their own way.

1 point

A child CANNOT accept or be held to a contract.

If a kid wants to tan there is free sun outside. This debate is more about who should be allowed to separate dumb kids from their money.

1 point

No. Minors are not known for making smart decisions for themselves. (If they did Justin Beiber would not have sold a single album)

The case in the news recently shows that some mothers never mature past the stage of being a minor herself.

The kid old leather-tits was taking tanning was a ginger ffs!

Ya, a redhead isn't going to burn and dramatically increase skin cancer risk.

Raven01 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here