CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Rhea

Reward Points:12
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
81%
Arguments:14
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
4 points

Raffles left Singapore for Bencoolen, where he was to be appointed the Lieutanent-Governer. It was an order from the headquarters, and although he tried to decline, it was rejected. He spent about a few years there before he had to go back to England because of a severe disease.

valid reason to me.

1 point

Provide some examples as to how? He did not betray Singapore. He had a valid reason to left. If not he wouldn't have come to Singapore in the first place.

1 point

How does that relate to anything? He still won in the end.

4 points

But, without R's ideas, would F still be able to build? Without any ideas?

1 point

It worked because Singapore is now a multi-racial society. Also, racism is a very serious offense here.

1 point

If he didn't care, he wouldn't have come to Singapore anyway. He wouldn't have left Farquhar in charge. If he didn't care, he wouldn't have come back.

2 points

But that simply means that he had more supporters and valid reasons to win the argument. You cannot just win an argument without reasons..

6 points

How was Raffles taking advantage of him? I'm sure Raffles had a valid reason to leave.

3 points

He had no choice. He had to go to Bencoolen. It wasn't his choice to go there.

3 points

Which proves that Raffles had more supporters and had better reasons which eventually made him win.

Rhea has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here