Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 8 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 85% |
Arguments: | 8 |
Debates: | 0 |
In some aspects vegetarianism might be good, for health, for animal saving. But I think it again comes to personal choice. Some people cannot live without eating meat, others do not like meat at all. Vegetarian's diet contains such things like proteins, iron, zinc, vitamins, which also useful for health. I can't say that it is wrong, but it is again personal choice of every person, so that it is tour right to decide weather vegetarianism goood or bad, right or wrong.
I agree with your point, not everyone wants their property to be damaged. Somebody can say it is vandalism, but on the other hand it is kind of art, self-expression. Maybe artists should transfer their street art for those people who want it in their homes, who probably will able to pay for their job. But still street art exists, it doesn't look so bad, moreover it is normally to see this kind of art in the streets.
People do believe that to drive at early age is not right, that there are much irresponsibility, inattention, inexperience. For example, in our country the driving age is 18. But I don't think that this age should be changed as a driving age. First of all, the memory, reflection and reaction of young people are certainly better than adult ones'. Most people nowadays start to drive at even their 40-50 years. I think not driving age, but corruption i this field should be stopped. Because people buy driving confirmations without getting an education in driving. After definite courses and practice young people should have rights to drive, why not? Even if it is very early. I have friends who drive at their early 18s, and i cannot say that they drive bad. So, driving at early age(in 16-18) should stay.
I agree that people should pay attention to their culture and traditions. People belong to particular culture and customs. Traditions are value that we need to appreciate as it came from our history, it is nation's treasure. Traditions hand down from generation to generation. So, why shouldn't we save it and hand down it to the next generation, to our children? Dance, music and other cultures in different nations and countries are the sign, the part of definite countries and nationalities. First of all, countries are rich with their values, their customs, traditions, music, history. All cultures have established a set of beliefs that constitute the code of values and moral laws. Especially we should pay attention to own culture, make it richer, leave it for future, as it was done for us by our ancestors.
I think using computers is not beneficial compare with using papers. First of all, by using computers we also waste papers, as we use printing as well. Moreover, computers are harm for health. As you know the long-term incorrect use of computers and related equipment can expose you to increased health risks. The third reason is why we shouldn't use computers instead of papers is that it is much better to write than type out. In some ways computers can help, but it is still necessary to use papers.
Nowadays some people say that career is not for women, but this argument is, in my opinion, outdated. Women should or even can have career. In many aspects women are smarter, it doesn't depend on your gender, but your skill level or education that you have. I agree that women are also human beings as men are, so it is their choice about career issue.Some women have to support their family, and notice that today in some families person who has a job is a woman, while husbands stay at home. So, women should have rights to choose career, have a job and earn money.
Almost in every school children have to wear a uniform. The question is should uniforms at schools be made compulsory? Do we need it? I guess that it should be mandatory part of education at schools. First of all, imagine that there are lots of children from different families with different opportunities and status. There can be rich ones or , on the contrary, not enough affordable ones. Uniform can make them look equal. Then, having school uniforms can make it easier for authorities to identify- those who aren't supposed to be within the school premises. The last argument for having uniform at schools is saving money on for families. Do you agree that it is more beneficial, as children have a set of uniform to wear. I think children supposed to wear uniform. It doesn't lead to nothing bad, so you can easily understand that I said above are benefits of uniform. It is for saving money, social status and for school safety by identifying school's students.
Discrimination based on age might be in different ways. Firstly, when it comes to job, work competency,discrimination of age still exists. For example in hospitals or health care system: people tend to trust those doctors, who have more experience, in other words they sometimes don't want to be treated by young doctors. It's discrimination of age. The second is that in job competency, where you can be not accepted just because of your age. You can be focused off, as you have less skill level. But on the other hand when it comes to respect or decision, in my point of view, adult people have rights more. So that discrimination based on age can exist, but not everywhere, especially in job, however, in some ways like making decision or regarding, discrimination sometimes should exist.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |