Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 80% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
If they had been more aggressive, the war would have begun before Britain was even close to having a good defence to stop anyone from invading them.Also, at that point of time, Britain was trying their best to avoid a second world war altogether This would easily have led to the fall of Britain, and in the process, demolish all possibilities of not having a second world war.
Shreyas Yes, Britain tried their best to prevent or at the least delay another war from happening. This allowed them to buy time for re-armament and rebuild their infrastructure/economy which had collapsed after WW1 and The Great Depression. Also, this policy was being carried out at a point of time where there was a slight chance of peace. Therefore, Britain tried their best to prevent a second world war, while allowing themselves to be more prepared in-case there is one. Almost no country was able to afford to go to war at that point of time as they were rebuilding their infrastructure and economy which fell after The Great Depression and WW1.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |