Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
ShriekinNinj
| Reward Points: | 3 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 77% |
| Arguments: | 2 |
| Debates: | 0 |
The national government's power to command a standing army in peacetime and to exert control over state militias is dangerous as it can lead to a unpredictable government. Standing armies can lead to moral corruption that can hurt independence and liberty.
No, the Constitution should not be ratified. The new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties, with the absence of a bill of rights. A stronger government will threaten the sovereignty and reputation of the states and the individuals. Like in Brutus 1, the bill of rights was necessary to protect the people of gov't because giving the federal government lots of power can result in people to sacrifice their liberties. Which means that anything can happen to the people and that big governments result in more representation of elites and less of other people.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
