Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 22 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 91% |
Arguments: | 24 |
Debates: | 0 |
No, it's not. he's the only one this happened with. Every other alert I received was dealt with once I responded but not J-Roc. No, one response wasn't enough, are you tools really this desperate that you'll rig the way a website works to feel like you're important? You're pathetic.
Now I have to type 50 characters. OK...whatever. How many times do I have to respond to your one response? Do you want people to post here? I don't think you do. I don't mind responding one for one but what you've done is wrong. You're reported.
You just did it again. This is the third time I've seen this with no new activity from you. Why do I keep seeing alerts from you when you aren't answering?
I did read it, I have it saved to my desktop and refer to it frequently. Now answer my question. How come when I answer you my new argument alert doesn't go away?
How come I saw you as a new dispute, answered you, and you're still showing up as a new dispute? The others who showed up as a dispute I answered and they disappeared...you don't. Why is that?
You think I'm the one trolling? You're the one assigning percentages to IPCC5.
Yes, it is hard to understand. I've read the report and not one single time do they give percentages.
I'm disputing my own statement. Who clarified it? I've seen other disputed statements now clarified. Who does the clarifying?
Is it really that hard to understand? In IPCC5 they didn't use percentages. You did. You are obviously lying. It's not that hard to see.
What do you mean by even if they didn't use percentages? They didn't use percentages therefore your argument is wrong.
|