CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Smiles302

Reward Points:3
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
80%
Arguments:4
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
4 most recent arguments.
2 points

Age restrictions yes. Advertising restrictions yes. Outright ban no for all the reasons listed above.

6 points

It can't be 100% true, even the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John contradict each other in places. Such as the birth place of Jesus etc. You have to take your own interpretation of the Bible, and you can't call any interpretation 100% true.

1 point

It's not a yes or no question...

So I'm answer "of course" evolution is a theory. Anyone who calls a scientific theory a fact doesn't understand how science works.

Evolution is the most comprehensive, all comprising theory we have to explain how we are the way we are at the minute. It's open to changes and restructuring. Just like any other scientific theory.

The easiest check-list to see if a theory is a good theory is that it can be proven false.

Evolution has a huge list of creatures that if found would prove the theory false.

3 points

Cosmetic surgery is surgery done for aesthetic reasons as opposed to health reasons. Re-constructive surgery is a different type of plastic surgery to cosmetic which I believe my opponent is referring to.

Surgery done to improve a person's health, be that physical or mental shouldn't be labelled as cosmetic. Re-building your body after an accident, removing a deformity or skin grafting for burn victims are necessary surgeries that genuinely effect people's quality of life.

Simply because a surgery effects your physical appearance is not what makes a surgery cosmetic.

Cosmetic surgery is unnecessary surgery. Changing your breast side, removing fat, looking younger.

I would ban cosmetic surgery as we have no idea what this kind of alterations could do to our genetic make-up for future generations. The biological reason we find people attractive is that they would make good potential mates. Hence why beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

If we end up with a generation of people "faking" their genes, finding themselves attracted to other people with "fake" good genes to match their we are bypassing the natural filter of incompatible genes.

Aside from the unhealthy goals of looking "perfect", a lot of cosmetic surgeries are a lazy way out of being healthy, eating right and exercising to stay in shape.

Smiles302 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here