Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

View All

View All

View All

RSS StarTrekFan

Reward Points:-2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
0 points

Did you know DNA is coding? It really is that's all DNA is.


You are just.... Sooooo...... Stupid.

DNA is biological material which exists in the physical realm. Codes are mathematical constructs which do not exist in the physical realm.

I am confident that nothing anybody could ever say to you would ever be sufficient to stop you conflating these two entirely separate things, because you are just simply too much of an idiot.

2 points

Also, it's: "They're a troll".

If you are going to troll this website like a 5 year old, might I suggest you improve your vocabulary first?

2 points

I've just been reading that thread. He banned you for upvoting your own arguments, not for disagreeing with him.

You sir are a liar.

1 point

Thank you for your post, Spartacus. I find Conservatives to be hateful and deceptive.

1 point

Sounds pathetic

Sounds like your buttocks are throbbing with hurt and pain.

4 points

What a super argument .... utter bullshit

Lol. Yeah, that was his argument. Not the wall of text underneath from highly qualified sources which you completely ignored. God, you're such a moron. I almost feel sorry for you.

1 point

Show us the words "omniscient" and/or "omnipotent" in the Bible.

The words "omnipotent" and "omniscient" did not exist when the Bible was translated into English, as you are fully aware. Please explain how your deliberate red herring fallacy constitutes the "logic and reason" you were just talking about. When you get done with that, you should be aware that Christians (which you claim to be) all agree that God is simultaneously omnipotent and omniscient. Please see:-

Also see the following Bible verses:-

Then Job answered the LORD and said, "I know that You can do all things, And that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted (Job 42:1-2).

You have searched me, LORD, and you know me. You know when I sit and when I rise; you perceive my thoughts from afar ( Psalm 139:1-4)

His understanding has no limit (Psalm 147:4-5)

For nothing will be impossible with God (Luke 1:37)

Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh; is anything too difficult for Me? (Jeremiah 32:27)

Before a word is on my tongue you know it completely, O LORD (Psalm 139:4).

You made up more versions of religion from your illusions and ignorance on religion

The Bible verses are there right in front of your lying face. Please carry on denying them. It's great to see a madman like you demonstrate his personal interpretation of "logic and reason" because it illustrates precisely why you should not be given the power to vote. Your version of "logic and reason" is denying the tenets of your own religion to score points and banning everyone who makes you look stupid.

1 point

Why do you think we have the "New Testament" rather than the "Old Testament"?

You don't have the "New Testament" rather than the "Old Testament" you fucking infuriating retard. You have the Old Testament AND the New Testament. You can't just ignore half of the Bible you complete muppet.

1 point

Respond to what exactly? Have they attacked someone? Americans don't really understand this whole attack and defence business very well.

1 point

Atheism (when using the term accurately, as is so often not the case nowadays) is, by definition, a lack of a worldview.

As previously discussed, your claims are almost always false because you are a pseudo-intellectual who does not understand the topics he writes about. Unfortunately, one has to wade through a smorgasbord of unnecessary synonyms to elicit just what the fuck you are saying first, since part of your pseudo-intellectual belief system is the idea that abuse of the online thesaurus is a good substitute for knowing what the fuck you are talking about.

"By definition", atheism is:-

Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Neither disbelief or lack of belief in God fit the profile of a "lack of worldview". Disbelief in God is the same thing as belief in no God, and "lack of belief" in God is the same thing as disbelief in God. If someone says they lack belief in something, they are saying they don't believe it. If the question is God or no God then there is no answer you can possibly give which makes you neutral, other than: "I don't believe I can answer that question". Which is of course, by definition, agnosticism.

About Me

I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here