- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
𝐼𝑡 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑢𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑎𝑛 𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡'𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒.
I know that most people that complain aren’t intending to be rude… but they end up looking that way to artists.
Questioning an artist’s motives and decisions regarding pricing is insulting to their artistic skill and belittles the fact that they’re trying to raise money to cover their financial responsibilities.
𝐈 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐮𝐩𝐬𝐞𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐮𝐩 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐭 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞. 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐮𝐩 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐩, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞. 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐬.
I mean seriously, the artist have to explain his/her own actions and decisions that he/she have chosen for the permissions and pricing of his/her own creations.
It's better not to buy the piece of art than complain about the price, it devalues the artist's work, skill and service (also financial responsibilities)
Of course it should be protected, not allowing people to wear what they want will be quite hypocrite and fascist.
& Swastika means different things to different people.
The swastika (as a character 卐 or 卍) has been and remains a sacred symbol of spiritual principles in Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism.
But since the 1930s, people think of it as a main feature of Nazi symbolism, and as a result, it has become stigmatized in the West by association with ideas of racism, hate, and mass murder which isn't correct becuz the name swastika comes from Sanskrit (Devanagari: स्वस्तिक), and denotes a "conducive to well being or auspicious"
The misinterpretation of swastika is simple hypocrisy since 20th century.
How can you even be free in a country when you can't wear whatever you want
I don't think so.
Because of my dad being in Air Force (India), I've moved around through my whole life. I've changed 5 schools.
I was born in state of Rajasthan, then moved to state of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Bihar, Assam, Goa and now New Delhi-from where I'm actually from.
Many people I meet find it unusual, but it's a normal thing for me.
You're only responsible for yourself in life, not for anyone else.
Though if you can help then you should but if you just can't help, if you fear drowning yourself, can't swim or something like that then it's okay, it depends on why you didn't help.
But no, I don't think someone is responsible for someone else's death in such a case.
Harry Potter, no doubt.
Although, it's a hotly debated topic but Hunger Games is no match for Harry Potter.
The Lord Of The Rings is a much better match for harry potter, the hunger game is out of discussion.
The fantasy world of Hunger games isn't that great, the first part/book is still good but the rest are not that good.
If we talk about the movies, the cinematography, the script, the screenplay & casting of Harry Potter is a million times better than of the hunger games.
If we talk about the book, the world, the background and every single detailing & of writing of Harry Potter is way better than of the hunger games.
In the first graph below, drawn from the past twelve months of searches online, the green line is search interest in Daniel Radcliffe, star of the Harry Potter movies, of course, yellow is "Harry Potter movie", red is "Hunger Games movie" and blue is "Jennifer Lawrence".