Twitter calls itself media, not me. Twitter decides what media is and is not on their platform and sells political ad space, which makes them a publisher just like a newspaper. When the platform is officially sold, you will pivot to that exact argument, but I will ignore you, holding you to your prior principal. If the left had lost Twitter and didn't make a peep, I'd be fine with your resolution. Where the left loses me is that they took your position for years, Musk bought Twitter, and now they claim Twitter is a threat to free speech, and billionaires should not have this much power, etc. Nah. It's a private company. Fu*k em.

Well, he did get us to 3.2% unemployment, gas was $1.75 per gallon, we were energy independent, and he started bringing manufacturing back to America. It sounds like you are saying a right winger is simply someone with basic common sense.

What's truly INSANE is to conclude ANYTHING from what I DON'T say.

In what way is it "insane" to assume that you avoid the same topics repeatedly because you cannot defend the left on those topics? It's actually just Occam's Razor which is a basic philosophical concept.

What's truly INSANE is to conclude ANYTHING from what I DON'T say.

Not to speak is to speak. For example, I pointed out that these cops killing blacks in Democrat run cities is clearly a Democrat run cities' problem. You didn't respond because blaming the right for anything happening in Boston or San Fransisco is an indefensable position.

So tell cops in Democrat cities to stop killing black people, and stop pretending that your areas' cop problem is magically the rights' or the flag's fault.

To think Kaepernick owe conservatives ANYTHING, is just as STUPID as thinking I do.

If leftist ideas weren't misguided, you'd jump at the chance to destroy right wingers in debates. You don't. You go radio silent. With as many topics as I've seen you avoid multiple times, I've come to the conclusion that you know the things these leftists say are insane. You just don't care for whatever personal reasons. That's your business. Pointing it out is mine.

they're misguided

If that were true, the left would be dying to debate the right on political topics on social media rather than censor them, and the left wouldn't use violence to shut up Allen West, Ben Shapiro, etc. The left would welcome the right to spew misguided nonsense, then would destroy them with logic in debates. Instead, they yell, scream, loot, take over city blocks attack anyone who disagrees with them, and use tactics to slander their opponents. Misguided people don't try to have a conversation with you just to have you scream in their face. Misguided people scream in your face and refuse debate.

What's the point here?

Judging by your past post that right wingers are racists who hate blacks, the fact that black conservatives get millions of views seriously contradicts your point. It isn't 1985 anymore. There are more non white Republicans today than white Republicans in total in 1985.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal-time_rule

"The equal-time rule specifies that American radio and media must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives a given amount of time to a candidate in prime time, it must do the same for another candidate who requests it, at the same price if applicable."