Okay. Richard Nixon did pass several GOOD enviormental acts which boosts his credibility as a "intelligent" politician. He was, however, an egomaniac.

Barack is obviously intelligent for having passed the first bill giving health care to the majority of Americans in the United States.

Barack Obama was chosen by Millions of Americans, not you. Why do you question his intelligence when he is OBVIOUSLY intelligent.

1. I never said they were, I simply stated that they harbor similar opinions on minorities. Come at me with the facts in the future. Nextly, it goes in steps. Harboring these policies eventually leads to massive, murderous action.

2. The Tea Party could be considered to be about race, widly because they do not, within their midst accept things which are private matters and uncontrollable. I can call someone who is against gay marriage a bad person, it's a civil right and by denying it you are denying someone else's liberty.

Being a patriot IS a bad thing when it blinds you. "The highest form of Patriotism is in itself DISSENT." - Howard Zinn

In what way was that unfortunate?

Prayer was in schools? That's putting one religion over one and entwining Church and State. Violating the first amendment. See several of the cases where the Jehova's witnesses sued the US and won several educational suits by claiming that the first Amendment protected their religious rights equally to others.

The Ten Commandments were in courts - Okay. Several thousand years ago the Law of Hammarabi was the accepted law around the world. An Eye for an Eye is still unacceptable today. If you want the Bible in the courts obviously you want the Old Testemant in courts too. So if your wife has shrimp or impedes some obscure practice during her mences she should be stoned to death, as the bible says.

Politicians Making References to God - What? Like they don't now?

Execution being the punishment of choice? ARE YOU ARGUING THAT THE LEGITIMATE PUNISHMENT FOR THE MAJORITY OF CRIMES SHOULD BE DEATH? Living with your crimes is better than instant relief.

Government had no control of business - Have you read the Jungle by Upton Sinclair? Perhaps you might understand what happens when the government doesn't control the food industry or the banks. The economy collapses and the food is covered in rat shit and broken glass.

Things like Homosexuality were condemned by society? Well obviously if you love this period so much and believe in this little bit you must, of course believe in the enslavement of african americans, right? Because, things like black skin were condemned then too.

In what way was that unfortunate?

Prayer was in schools? That's putting one religion over one and entwining Church and State. Violating the first amendment. See several of the cases where the Jehova's witnesses sued the US and won several educational suits by claiming that the first Amendment protected their religious rights equally to others.

The Ten Commandments were in courts - Okay. Several thousand years ago the Law of Hammarabi was the accepted law around the world. An Eye for an Eye is still unacceptable today. If you want the Bible in the courts obviously you want the Old Testemant in courts too. So if your wife has shrimp or impedes some obscure practice during her mences she should be stoned to death, as the bible says.

Politicians Making References to God - What? Like they don't now?

Execution being the punishment of choice? ARE YOU ARGUING THAT THE LEGITIMATE PUNISHMENT FOR THE MAJORITY OF CRIMES SHOULD BE DEATH? Living with your crimes is better than instant relief.

Government had no control of business - Have you read the Jungle by Upton Sinclair? Perhaps you might understand what happens when the government doesn't control the food industry or the banks. The economy collapses and the food is covered in rat shit and broken glass.

Things like Homosexuality were condemned by society? Well obviously if you love this period so much and believe in this little bit you must, of course believe in the enslavement of african americans, right? Because, things like black skin were condemned then too.

In calling the Tea Partiers NAZIs we're comparing them to people who had similar policies on Minorities and people who thought differently than them. I.e. The Tea Party has expressed openly racist, homophobic & nationalistic views, therefore they are similar to the NAZIs.

That's actually quite a good argument. I think in actuality I am prepared to take that side over my own. That's all quite true.

Probably because they enjoy having companies fight over them by throwing thousands of dollars at them

You are ABSOLUTELY right! Thank you, for some reasons people don't understand every american has the SAME first amendmant rights.

Who am I to dictate your argument policy? That's the way it works buddy, that's the standard your held to and if you willingly choose to ignore it, your not only ignoring--society, your showing your ignorance.

Secondly, stop calling them "Illegals" like they aren't people just like you. Your clumping a group of people together when they're doing what they need to to support their families just like you and I.

Sure. But they needed to rally for support so that they could keep the law intact.

It's irrational to put into operation laws which go against the United States Constitution which applies to Hispanic Americans who will be effected by this law.