Well I do not know the type of Atheism that you believe in. Is it Hard-Atheism or Soft-Atheism?

From my experience in the matter it would seem to be Theist v Atheist debaters that are more common.

It brings us the question that if the following is true in the future would you be forced to not carry a fetus/baby to term because there is a chance it might miscarry if the technology exists for growing a baby in a tube so to speak.

Are you okay with theists and deists joining in the conversation?

Is there a description of God that you find acceptable?

What do you mean? Playing it seems more to be playing semantics. I consider God to be a deity that has supreme power over the universe/forces but that is my personal definition the actual definition is the following.

1. (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.

2. (in certain other religions) a superhuman being or spirit worshiped as having power over nature or human fortunes; a deity.

I personally am wondering what you mean by the question first.

So... let me get this straight: The US government wants companies to supply/cover birth control for it's employees, but some companies (that are religious) disagree with this? If I never got this correct, could somebody clarify for me?

Hobby Lobby will provide most contraceptives but will not allow the birth control pills they say cause de facto abortion in their opinion. The pills work by not allowing a fertilized egg to implant in the mothers uterus. They considered a fertilized egg a person and were suing as their say the mandate violates their religious beliefs and therefore violate the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It is in the video that I posted. I will give you others if you are curious.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/ 30/supreme-court-hobby-lobby/

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/01/us/hobby-lobby-case-supreme-court-contraception.html?_r=0

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/06/30/supreme-court-hobby-lobby-religion-contraception-obama/11473189/

Nevermind my mistake. May I ask an question? What is your opinion on forcing religious companies to provide contraception?

religious companies view contraceptives as bad and don't want to be forced to provide them with the health care plans they provide.

Hobby Lobby said that only pills that cause de facto abortion in their opinion would apply. (I would like to note that it is birth control because it is technically not a pregnancy as the fertilized egg has not implanted)

I am personally against companies providing contraception/abortion pills as it would clearly violate the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution as it infringes on religious freedom. I do understand where Hobby Lobby is coming from where they say that birth control pills they do not want to provide cause a de facto abortion.

I am assuming that you are for the contraceptive mandate Cartman?

This is horrible. Religious persecution is alive and well. When are they going to stop taking away the rights of Christians?"

They ruled it unconstitutional? I do not know how Hobby Lobby is being persecuted?