- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).|
Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
The right has tried to shrink the power of government the left has expanded it. What did you expect from a political party that supports censorship, freezing bank accounts of people who are convicted of no crime but say things they don't like, likes investigations of political rivals and FBI raids on their opponents' homes? I would expect cameras everywhere if I were you. Social scores and wrong think punishments are already here. Can't wait to see what the authoritarian left gives us next. Organ harvesting? Welding people in their homes during Covid? The Chi Coms do it, and leftist politicians keep telling us how great the CCP is.
Let it be noted that Silly was unable to disprove the claim or form a formal argument for the defense. Also let it be noted that Silly pretended to copy and paste from mediabiasfactcheck, and that what he or she posted in bold did not match what was actually on the mediabiasfactcheck site. For example, Silly posted
Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
The credibility rating on the actual site was "MIXED" and not "LOW" as Silly falsely transcribed. The rest of what he or she put in bold followed in the same way.
In terms of this journalist, it's my view that he was searched, NOT because he was investigating Biden, but because a lawful search warrant was issued..
The NAZIs in the 1930s and 1940s issued warrants. What exactly was the warrant for do you suppose?
A strawman is to intentionally recreate your opponents' argument and attack an argument they never made because it's easier to debate against your version of their argument than their actual argument. The sentence used in this case is called a question.
Wondering more why you're ignoring this.
Project Veritas has never lost in court against anyone. Not one single time, and Snopes is a far left "fact checker" site that has had to delete many claims due to defamation and false information in court.
In the link you provided, nowhere does it disprove the person in question having actually said the exact thing Project Veritas claimed they said. Snopes saying they don't like this or that does not erase the person actually saying on video, "yes, voter ID would cut down on fraud, and we plan on bussing people to the voting booths."
It's not a court case, so don't need a charge, but let's go with insighting an insurrection by bailing out ANTIFA members who attacked federal buildings and took over city blocks while armed.
You didn't watch the video or read the article. The man in question, John Sullivan, broke into the capitol building by force and begain giving instructions to others to follow him and gave them instruction on what to do. This isn't speculation. He's facing prison charges for insurrection, amongst other charges. He was paid $35,000 by CNN and $35,000 by NBC, equaling $70,000. His identity and political persuasion have been proven in court. He goes on livestream videos as ANTIFA and is known for it. He also holds ANTIFA rallies.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!