Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 413 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 87% |
Arguments: | 439 |
Debates: | 29 |
More generally, how will a lawsuit settle this issue? Do not speak in terms of Trump, but your notions of the purpose of the judiciary?
I ask this loser to prove he is intelligent and rational and he immediately and irrationally changes the subject and proves the opposite.
What a fool. ROFL
Not a scientist, eh? We know the universe did not arise by natural means out of nothing due up the 1st Law of Thermo and that the universe is not eternal due to the 2nd Law. It is not your ignorance that is the problem, but your anti-science naturalism.
Is it possible that all of reality proves Hod’s existence, but you are too mentally ill to comprehend, understand and/or accept reality?
Prove these claims, snowflake? Or should we take them as evidence you are mentally ill?
That is funny given the sheer volume of murderers committed by atheists in the last 100 years.
He says He does. That is good enough for all but the mentally ill.
Show me a “concept” using only your senses? Or any other non-material thing.
I understand you are not a philosopher and therefore just make crap up to suit your purposes. But you cannot prove your definition is right.
If am allowed to say my self interest is that I not murder then I am allowed to say my self interest is that I do murder. Again, you have removed morality from the equation. If a man rapes and murders your daughter, you may not like his choice, but you have no moral grounds to object.
|