"Oh God" is just an expression. When you say "for fucks sake" you aren't really worrying about the sake of fuck, now are you?

What is it with you theists that makes you think everyone believes in God at least a little. I and many others don't at all. There is no God and if I brought myself to believe in one I'd be delusional because I'd believe in something that doesn't exist.

I suggest you start facing the fact that an atheist finds theist schizophrenic, just like an atheist seems lost to a devil to a theist.

But an atheist doesn't believe in devils either, which makes you look even more crazy to one, if you thought they were influenced by a devil.

http://health.discovery.com/centers/sex/ sexpedia/breast.html

Not doing anything can solve something, but if you do hard work you don't let it be a coincidence.

If you pray you expect the coincidence to happen and if it doesn't you think you haven't prayed enough, if it does you think it worked and start believing in whatever religion told you to do it even more.

After you believe even more you start taking seriously even things you previously thought were absurd... and a fundie is born (and every time that happens a happy kitten dies of cancer).

Neither have babies until a baby is bitten, so the bitten baby would have to get blood just like any other vampire, but I don't know about the werewolf babies...

No, the violent make the horny kill to rape instead of drink to sex.

I just can't believe how often I read some ignorant imply that people who have sex for pleasure are immoral. We're people not animals, of COURSE we will have sex for pleasure. Haven't we evolved above thinking everything we enjoy is bad for us???

Besides, scientist confirm a LOT that sex is healthy. It's a double win if you wear protection.

Anyway, I agree that widely available video games should contain more sex, puzzles and education and less violence and luck based playing.

If I'm going to make a video game it's going to be a tactical educational and have a healthy measure of realism (sex, people have it all the time, deal with it!) and it would have a selectable difficulty level that would make you bite your teeth off!

I'd never waste my life on virgins, people don't stay virgins even after life for being pretty or good in bed.

If there was a religion where you kill yourself to play Blizzard video games for an eternity... "Has anyone seen a gun lately?... I'm going hunting - THE ZERG!"

Besides, I'm gay and it would be hell for me to surrounded by a bunch of women waiting for me to have sex with them..."For the last time in 32 thousand years, I said I need a scrunchie and !hellooo-oooooo! it doesn't look like a vagina to me! I ASKED FOR LAVANDA!!! NOT PURPLE!! Grow a head! One or the other!!"

Eeerm, aren't vampires bisexual?

(cool questions, by the way)

I think the argument of sanctity of marriage is horrific.

If you make yourself a loaf of bread and eat it day after day, will it taste any worse if someone else on another planet also gets to make his/her own loaf or bread and eat it?

No it won't. Will the loaf you eat be any less nutritious if someone else on a remote planet also does the same?

No.

Ergo sanctity of marriage is nothing but jealousy of marriage in disguise. You only want marriage for yourself so you can have something that someone else doesn't.

GROW UP KIDS! That kind of behaviours is criticized in kindergarten when a bully wants to have a playground ride only to himself.

Not that I support marriage, I just support everyone's right to call their bond marriage. It's such a stupid trivial childish crap, but since people take is seriously, then I suppose I have to too.

[edit]Hmm, I already used that argument on some other debate, except that I used beans instead of bread.

Whatever Jake, it's very easy to lie and be a bigot and a fundie, especially over internet.

Approximately 80% of homophobes are gay and I'm SURE the rest have their issues too, mostly connected with sexuality.

If you think that a person would turn gay if he was allowed to, than you must be thinking of a person who is attracted to men, you are referring to a GAY person and a GAY person turning GAY ISN'T VERY DRAMATIC, NOW IS IT?!

An intelligent straight person would never like it to not allow gays to marry and adopt children.

If gays can marry and adopt that means that baby making isn't a very big deal since the gays are going to raise them. (If you are a religions fundie, that means you can be more logically for pro-life if you are pro-gay-marriage)

Plus, if there are so many women left alone, or rather lonely, than you can have a lot of sex.

Oh, and by the way, straight men like sex with women (right guys? :)), so they couldn't mind.

The only people who could POSSIBLY mind gays are gay people who don't want to be gay(...and raise kids and miss all the coitus..., but they don't like it anyway) and women who fall in love with gays. As some comedian woman says: "I'm a fag-hag, but now I think about my wishing in youth about being surrounded by handsome men, I should have been more specific."

That's why the whole point if politics is making a system where there could be as many people happy as possible.

Words, such as morality came to exist to manipulate when some people felt entitled to have more than others.

We ALL know what we should act like. Morality is just a word used to make some feel like they should act whatever you attach the word to.

Basically, you are just suppose to get your happiness and let others get theirs.