CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Acn051293

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:2
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
2 most recent arguments.
2 points

The UK. I know it doesn't seem correct but it is. Firstly, the special relationship between The United States and The United Kingdom is strong; Stronger than any other alliance known to man. The military power of the US and indeed the cunning and wisdom af the RAF, The Royal Navy, and its special forces. Even though The US does not have a friendly relationship with Europe, the UK is a member of the EU, The UN, and NATO, the WTO, and indeed the commonwealth. So that's the power of; The US, UK France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Ireland etc. Against China! Easier said than done but that's fact. WE WOULD WIN. The opinion that Russia could win a world war is just a myth. Since the death of Stalin and The Soviet Union, nuclear weopons are their only threat; no military cunning, no decent air force or Army, and indeed no respect for their own Nation.

1 point

If World War Three were to start, it would be in the next fifty years. I believe there will be another financial meltdown, and there will be a scramble for oil and natural resources ( notably by the United States and China who waste the most energy ) Also, the other way in which a war could start would be starvation. The United Kingdom leads the way for the biggest influence on the WTO ( World Trading Organisation ) and could starve much of the third world if it wanted to. If instances were to occur that Europe's relationship with Asia were becoming hostile, then starvation would become imminent in most of Asia. For instance, China develops much of the Worlds products ( approximately 39% of consumer goods ) however it does not have the capability to cultivate it's own food without American and European exports.

Secondly, It is most likely that if War was imminent, then it is likely to be caused by the scramble over WMD's. For example, the notorious leaders of Iran and North Korea. However, they will be undoubtedly wiped out by the UN and NATO within a matter of days.

Acn051293 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here