Wars do not contribute to progress. to prove it:

At first, wars destroy buildings, statues and libraries. For example, the great Gothic cathedrals and buildings were destroyed in the 2nd World War. The government buildings in York (now Toronto), the then capital of Upper Canada were also burned down by the Americans in April, 1813. The Burning of Washington in 1814 was an incident during the War of 1812. During World War II, Japanese military forces destroyed or partly destroyed numerous Chinese libraries, including libraries at the National University of Tsing Hua, Peking (lost 200,000 of 350,000 books), the University Nan-k'ai, T'ien-chin (totally destroyed, 224,000 books lost), Institute of Technology of He-pei, T'ien-chin (completely destroyed), Medical College of He-pei, Pao-ting (completely destroyed), Agricultural College of He-pei, Pao-ting (completely destroyed), University Ta Hsia, Shanghai (completely destroyed), University Kuang Hua, Shanghai (completely destroyed), National University of Hunan (completely destroyed). All these arguments shows that a lot of buildings, statues and libraries were destroyed because of wars. As a result, books were burned, cultures were damaged. So, how wars can contribute progress, if all achievements and knowledge, that were reached during many years, are destroyed in one day.

Secondly, wars do not contribute progress, because it carry death of thousand people. Statistics shows that, during the World War II, over 60 million people were killed, which was over 2.5% of the world population. Many people died because of diseases, poverty and starvation. That means there could not be any progress in such situations. Wars carry only destroying and death.

Firstly, I completely agree that in single sex schools children blossom and develop their self-esteem, besides their educational skills may become better.

Secondly, some people tend to believe that there may exist envy, however, it is just stereotype. Because, nowadays, in single sex schools are equal uniform, and girls or boys can't see clothes or another things of another student.

Thirdly, single sex scools offer to explore a leadership to every girl and boy. Studying apart play an important role in developing of self-esteem. Because, in adolescence girls become more shy and may have problems with science and mathematics, while boys blossom in this sphere. Studying separately is the better way for their developing.

Besides, children focus mostly on education. There is no boys in single sex school for girls and mutually for the boys, and it is clear that children pay more attention to studying and their education.

To conclude, I definitely agree that single sex schools are better to educate children

I agree with this point of view. Firstly, children may become "immune" or numb to the horror or violence, because of watching a lot of programs which contain violence,assault and etc.

secondly, children see main characters of program and try to look like them, in addition, they may start to search lovers like in the cartoons, which are not exist at all, failed in searching they could not marry during their whole life.

What is the solution?

parents should point out that although the actor has not actually been hurt or killed, such violence in real life results in pain or death; try to fulfill child's schedule with sport, music, education, in order to make limited time for TV watching and create different options for their baby.

Vote PRO. Because it is our future generation!