both eating at home, and eating out is about the same equal. it depends on many things really. on age for example. children should not eat ot somewhere, but at home (school lunch). as persons grows up, it is flexible issue, whether to eat at home or outside. as for me, i am more an extrovert type of person, so i like going out and eat somewhere, seeing people, being surrounded by society. it does not always have to be people though. i like discovering new places, food, cultures, and all those restaraunts create themed places, like for example as if you order chinese food or make it at home, or you go to the restaraunt and eat chinese food, in chinese type of surrounding and feel very chinese. but eating at home should be fixed and being kept as a tradition, for example, Family Sunday, when you cook all together with your family and eat together, chatting, laughing.

An argument worths nothing without an evidence to it, of course you need a proof to make a statement. Sometimes, though, there can be so very absolutely obvious things to say about that it is ridicilous to be asked to provide a proof to it, but we belong to the time of law. You either make it with proof provided, or corrupt, but it is another issue.

I think that animals should not be treated as people's tool at getting something. Also i am not even sure if people have right to kill animals and eat them. When you talk about that it sounds scary, doesn't it? i understand that sometimes humanity have to make decisions whether either us or them. I do really get that. But still, it does not work with me completely. I can't stand seeing how people treat animals like...animals. that is all irony in it. We are so used being cruel to those friends of us, that word "animal" became a synonym of non-ethical creatures. i realize that it sounds confusing, but so is me when thinking of animal treatment issues.

school uniform is definetely good idea, and first of all because it strengthens student's sense of discipline, which in my opinion is the most important thing students should learn in schools. Schools should provide all students with uniform by themselves (and obviously get paid for that) because from my personal experience, tasking students to get uniform SOMEWHERE THERE, ON SOMETHAT street would not get to any good.

i used to think it was a government conspiracy, but i am not sure now. the version of government conspiracy certainly sounds really more attractive and interesting. but still i prefer believing that it was all Al-Qaeda, because the only thought of that government could that easily turn more than three thousand of innocent people, (majority of them being U.S citizens) into a tool to get someone's resources destroys my belief into that there is someone with high moral in government. it is all the same if Voldemort (Al-Qaeda) ruined Hogwarts and killed all those people, but turns out to be it all was Harry Potter (government), but he was just so good at lying and acting.

For those who's not homosexual, there is a freedom of choice whether to think of homosexuality as right or wrong. but for those whose nature is limited to have sexual feelings to the same sex, the decision is already made without asking them. this is unfair. they did not ask for that, i am sure, but what can you do? it is the way you were born. so when the frist stage of fighting with theirselves is done, there is a fight with nature, with society, religion. why should some people deal with it, and the others, those who is not accepting that, judge and ban it? if we say about the nature and religion, come on, we do not know if nature really banned same sex relationships, personally i think nature is about live without pretending. so if you are a real homesexual , then so be it. religion? here i am confused. i mean religion correlates with equity between humanity, understanding. so why cannot people be happy the way they really are? then again, love is not about what type of person are you, wherre are you from, and what do you look like, but for purity of the feeling.