Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS Atypican

Reward Points:4875
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
atypican(4875) Clarified
1 point

Denies = Does not allow

Inhabitants=the people living within the territory in question

You do see that the debate "Title" and "Description" are meant to be combined as one statement right?

atypican(4875) Clarified
1 point

I was purposefully not specific about the government I had in mind, the basic right I had in mind and the type of parasitism I had in mind because I want to see if someone can refute the general principle

1 point

I give it by default. Someone has to do something to lose my respect before I will stop giving it.

atypican(4875) Clarified
1 point

I support the abolition of all religion. You however, only support the abolition of religions other than your own


You think only "non-religious" systems should be tolerated.


You are denouncing others for openly doing what you inadvertantly do.

You seem to fancy your brand of intolerance somehow better because you take issue with even more groups (except yours). Wise up

1 point

I'm flattered that you spent time investigating me and sharing your suspicions. Here's a hot tip: If you really want to get someones perspective, ask questions without including personal attacks.

I am interested in the fiscal/monetary policies implemented by his regime.

Had I thougbt your question was asked in good faith I might have had more to say. (Smirks)

1 point

You seem seduced by the very sort of rhetoric that inspires people to designate overly large groups of people as "the enemy". You have seemingly at least, become part of the problem.

1 point

So you think white people should embrace race based tribalism and stop feeling responsible concerning the well being of those who aren't "us"?

BTW I have a controversial opinion about certain ethnic groups being considered rightful owners of certain portions of our earth. Might be interesting to debate.

1 point

So you think your culture, (by virtue of the superiority you suppose it has) should enjoy rights that others do not?

Must tribalism involve considering other groups generally inferior?

1 point

A more reasonable description of knowledge is:

The information (however erroneous or useful) accessible to one or more agents.

Viewing knowledge as "justified true belief" sets us up to view portions of the information we manage as errorless and our thinking becomes more rigid and dogmatically absolutist. Instead of saying "I have justified true beliefs" its better to say "I think I have adequate information".

atypican(4875) Clarified
1 point

No. I believe those strories were what some people found inspiring and chose to canonize. My religion is syncretic and has been influenced by various faiths. I think yours is too, but you are so committed to anti-religion rhetoric it would be difficult to get you to admit it.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Unresolved
Winning Position: Contest: "Identity Politics"
Winning Position: AOK
Tied Positions: I don't eat meat vs. I eat meat
Winning Position: Truth (a bad concept)

About Me

"I help raise cats for "not herding" Please send links to where I failed to address valid points."

Biographical Information
Name: David Janca
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Postal Code: 87321
Websites: My Twitter

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here