Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!

Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

View All

View All

View All

RSS Banthisaccou

Reward Points:82
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
banthisaccou(82) Clarified
1 point


There are multiple meanings to this word, some have good implications and some bad.

one can believe in science and be religious

No they can't.


banthisaccou(82) Clarified
0 points

What is a libertarian socialist?

Someone who wants collective ownership of the means of production rather than the state owning the means of production or the rich owning it. Socialism at it's roots was always libertarian, that is what true socialism is about. The first socialists were people who wanted to take the egalitarian principles of classical liberalism even further and eliminate the concept of class from society, so that no group would have power over others. The idea of the state owning everything came later, and was more of a faulty way of transitioning into "real" socialism than an end goal in and of itself. You see, Marx among others arrived at the conclusion that to implement socialism you would first have to have a central organizing body who knew what they were doing to set up socialism and teach the masses how to self govern. The idea was to have a state (with democracy and with checks and balances) which would initially run things through a mix of central planning and democracy. For obvious reasons though, the state always becomes corrupt and expands it's power rather than "withering away" as Marx and other socialist thinkers intended. That is why libertarian socialists reject the state, and instead condone socialism arising from a grass roots level. We believe in democracy and equality, but not at the expense of individual liberty.

banthisaccou(82) Clarified
1 point

Should I say SJW instead of liberal, then?

You should call them liberals or "statists" if they are social democrats or socialists who are genuinely authoritarian. I am a libertarian socialist.

banthisaccou(82) Clarified
1 point

You are one of very few

You'd be surprised. Not every left winger is an establishment liberal politician or an SJW stereotype presented to you by Steven Crowder.

He's a contemptible mental vegetable with compressed inactive testicles.

Nom would swim through a waste processing plant just for the opportunity to be mean to someone.

0 points

They ALL have mental disorders

You have mental disorders.

2 points

I think he should. You should also roofie him with that tea and show him what it's like to be violated, for all the times he did dirty things to helpless animals and perpetuated rape culture.

0 points

Some of them are and some of them aren't. .

About Me

I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here