Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 1 |
Debates: | 0 |
I am new to this site, so I am just browsing around at this point, and I found this debate fairly interesting. I thought I would offer a little side note though; An "agnostic theist" is not defined correctly above. Agnosticism regards the existence of knowledge, or lack thereof. Although it is usually used in a way that is synonymous with uncertainty, it actually refers to whether or not one believes it is possible to offer a conclusive answer on said subject. Thus, an agnostic theist is one who subscribes to theism, as in they believe that some deity does exist, but they do not believe it will ever be possible to conclusively decide one way or the other. One can be an agnostic atheist as well, and thus not believe that any deities exist but also not believe it will ever be possible to come to a conclusion on the matter of existence.
|