Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 92% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
polygamy should not under any circumstances be legalized. people wonder why the sexist ways of our ancestors are still continuing in todays society? maybe its because shows like Sister Wives that portray 4 dumb blondes and their 20 some odd children loving one man and showing no sign of caring that he "loves" them all infront of each other. If i found out my husband and father of my children was playing the same role in 4 other womens home, i would not be okay with it. As a female human being with feelings, no women can tell me it doesnt hurt them seeing the man they love play the care giver role for another women and her family.
i dont care if its an ancient tradition, or where in the world it is. if cheating is frowned upon, then so should polygamy. Obviously men who practise polygamy are not going to say it should be banned- why would they give up a chance at playing 4 women their entire lives?
what heredities give different races advantages? if 3 people of 3 races are raised the exact same say way, in the same environment, are you saying one would be more sucessful simply because of his/her race? the same goes for men and women. there is no single advantage EVERY man has over EVERY women or vice versa. its a matter of nuture over nature
no it is not okay for schools to randomly drug test students. it is none of the schools concern wether or not a student is using drugs, they are there for the purpose of education, not to monitor what students are doing in their spare time. the fact is many of the worlds biggest sucessors are infact drug users..
yes it is clearly wrong if a baby is created solely for the purpose of science. a baby is a human- and although they cannot speak and tell you how they feel, they clearly have feelings- not only physical needs but a natural born need to feel love and affection from a mother. and what do they do with the baby after experimentation? if the baby is adopted into a family it is highly unlikely the baby will ever be able to lead a normal life... the mental consequences of knowing that oneself was created solely for science would be tremendous.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |