Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!

Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

View All

View All

View All

RSS Bobbywhite

Reward Points:5
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

5 most recent arguments.
1 point

Just because we are making this deal with Iran doesn't prove that they indeed are abiding by our conditions and even if they are it doesn't guarantee they won't build a nuclear weapon 15 years from now only for the next 10 years or so after which we will essentially lift all nuclear restrictions on them.

1 point

The Iran deal is to beneficial towards Iran and insulting towards the United States and our allies. We are lifting sanctions on a country who is a sworn enemy to both us and Israel in exchange for 15 years of possible safety. The inspections can be delayed by up to 24 days and even if there is a violation, a committee of 8 powers including Iran, has 50 days to decide if it is serious enough to completely "rip apart" the deal. Even with all of this the deal doesn't even give us long term safety since, after eight years the EU will terminate all proliferation-related sanctions and the US will terminate or modify sanctions preventing Iran’s acquiring nuclear-related commodities and services (translation: ballistic missiles).

3 points

In order to keep our country from being thrown into more chaos, we need to adopt the Federalists' constitution. With our current constitution, the Articles of Confederation, the government isn't given enough power to receive taxes and therefore couldn't assist the states of form any type of standing army to protect the US citizens. Without instituting a new constitution we are putting our country at great risk of turning into a state of anarchy.

1 point

We've already been trying negotiations with North Korea since the 80's, they've continued to break treaties and continue their nuclear program. They will continue to manipulate us to get resources and if they have weapons that can threat U.S. soil and they verbally make those threats, those weapons need to be dealt with and if that means a mass military strike in North Korea? Then that's what we need to do.

1 point

I agree more along the lines of option 1. It isn't very likely that a preemptive military strike will go as smoothly as planned and there is a good chance a lot of lives could be lost but it is the only option that provides a positive outcome for the future. We can't simply ignore them otherwise we will find ourselves in a world where not only do all the stable super powers have nukes but the smaller more rogue nations of the world. On the other hand if we were to go in and simply nuke North Korea we would end countless civilians lives and also risk nuclear war.

Bobbywhite has not yet created any debates.

About Me

I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here