Sorry Elvira, your argument has way too many flaws, particularly with respect to the fact that you are citing extreme cases of impressive talent, capability, etc found only in a few women, or groups of women, and extrapolating those small percentages to make a suggestive claim that either most or all women have those same impressive capabilities. For example, your reference to the female black belt may be true... But how many female black belts are out there REALLY? As many as men?? Highly doubt it. And who would throw a harder punch between a male and female blackbelt?? Or between your average untrained man and woman?? Sorry, but the man will always deliver a harder punch in comparison to the women equivalent with respect to each other's level of training/experience in whatever martial arts you are referring to..... HENCE THE REASON, why the phrase "hitting like a girl" has been engrained into the global culture, with women rarely ever seeming phased or upset when this insult is used... Because it is entirely true; the expression would not have become so popular if it had no valid truth behind it.

And I have no idea where anyone ever made the claim on this page that states that it is okay for a man to say that they could beat a woman "20 shades of blue" with relative ease to her face. Although this is a relatively true generalization due to the sheer physical strength differences between the sexes, that does not mean that is in any way an acceptable thing to do. So for you to pull this claim out of thin air to try to bolster your other half assed, sub par debate points that you have raised while simultaneously attempting to undermine any reasonable and logical argument raised by a man by making us look like violent animals is good tactic... But any half wit can see right thru it.

Nice try tho!

Sorry Elvira, your argument has way too many flaws, particularly with respect to the fact that you are citing extreme cases of impressive talent, capability, etc found only in a few women, or groups of women, and extrapolating those small percentages to make a suggestive claim that either most or all women have those same impressive capabilities. For example, your reference to the female black belt may be true... But how many female black belts are out there REALLY? As many as men?? Highly doubt it. And who would throw a harder punch between a male and female blackbelt?? Or between your average untrained man and woman?? Sorry, but the man will always deliver a harder punch in comparison to the women equivalent with respect to each other's level of training/experience in whatever martial arts you are referring to..... HENCE THE REASON, why the phrase "hitting like a girl" has been engrained into the global culture, with women rarely ever seeming phased or upset when this insult is used... Because it is entirely true; the expression would not have become so popular if it had no valid truth behind it.

And I have no idea where anyone ever made the claim on this page that states that it is okay for a man to say that they could beat a woman "20 shades of blue" with relative ease to her face. Although this is a relatively true generalization due to the sheer physical strength differences between the sexes, that does not mean that is in any way an acceptable thing to do. So for you to pull this claim out of thin air to try to bolster your other half assed, sub par debate points that you have raised while simultaneously attempting to undermine any reasonable and logical argument raised by a man by making us look like violent animals is good tactic... But any half wit can see right thru it.

Nice try tho!