CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Dadoubean

Reward Points:1
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
38%
Arguments:4
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
4 most recent arguments.
0 points

Science has little solid facts. God has no solid science facts. Can't prove something with something you can't prove true.

0 points

There is proof of the Big Bang, but how do you know it actually happened? There are numerous creation theories, though Big Bang has the most evidence. How could you prove something wrong if you don't have evidence to go against the argument that God created everything? You can't use science theories like the Big Bang against this argument because there isn't sufficient evidence to prove the Big Bang as a fact. Use solid science facts against it instead.

-1 points

We can all agree there is right and wrong. How something like the Holocaust is wrong. We have a moral standard. God exists, at least as a concept which represents the right side of something. What I can think is this is science vs morals. You can't deny the fact that science is correct. Morals also exist, but there are examples of morals clashing with science. Thinking off the top of my head, I use genetic engineering as an example. Is it ethical to use it on humans. Is it unethical to not use it when it can hold the key to saving lives? Also, many theories of science aren't proven, so technically, it isn't correct. When you say "God created the universe", where is the proof? How can an entity that can't be perceived have created our reality? Also issues like Hitler mass murdering Jews and other people existing contradicts a loving God. Why would evil exist in this world if God exists? If God doesn't exist, how could righteousness exist? How would we know right from wrong? Killing your neighbor wouldn't be wrong because it benefits you when you take their stuff. Humans are capable of the good side towards each other because God represents the good in human society towards each other. Because there is a right, there is also a wrong. That wrong is what benefits an individual, while the right is good for everyone. God is the good in everyone in one entity.

0 points

I agree. The Christian God is supposed to be benevolent, yet his followers aren't. I've met some horrible people who call themselves Christian, though I also know nice people that are also Christians.

Dadoubean has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here