Personally if there was an option I would say no gender has it 'easier'...

I am bored to death of seeing this argument and seeing men be publicly shamed for having 'more rights' than women. Surely men being slaughtered for this reason proves in itself that they are the gender who do not have it easier.

It's easy for a woman to create a crowd of people who defend her and argue with men for saying something completely out of proportion however if it was the other way round it would be a completely different story.

Men within families tend to be the ones who work their hardest providing in order to ensure the family is financially stable and happy and although this is the case for women too, it is statistically proven that men are more dominant in this area

^ don't use the 'women don't have the same rights in a workforce'I as men' as this is incorrect in a modern society.

Yes, women have a lot of social expectations but so do men with the way he should act towards women? I find it completely wrong to have the gender debate constantly because both genders should be equal.

I am sorry - I am expressing my view via your post as I believe the possible answers to this debate are way too closed and biased and secondly - your opinion is completely wrong.

Mohammad to Islam is what Jesus Christ is to Christians - and debates like this are the exact ones which make people believe religion causes conflict.

As an agnostic, I completely disagree with the idea of one faith trying to compete with another. People have the right to express themselves and follow what they believe in.

What you have stated about Jesus and Mohammad is from a scripture. The Bible and the Qu'ran have been left open to interpretation and I feel like this is exactly the problem why religion causes so much conflict - because people like you misinterpret a piece of information (which can be argued unreliable)

Everyone should respect that many people have different beliefs and followers. Muhammed was clearly a role model to Muslims for him to have such a title instead of this "vindictive peadophile" you make him out to be.

Mohammad and Jesus = equal in importance.

I completely agree with this. I think I laughed a little when I read the government have our 'best interests at heart.'

You can't give someone the title of a psychopath for expressing zero emotions?

Psychopaths can, and have changed due to prison reformation.

Saying that psychopaths deserve death is completely out of order.

First of all - how hypocritical is this? If one ends a life and therefore has their life ended by the death penalty - surely the person who is the one to do this should also have their life ended for committing exactly the same crime?

There has been endless evidence to prove this does not work and hasn't worked. People commit murder out of passion, defence and with reason (which even though should not be an excuse, you have to put yourself in their shoes before coming to such a conclusion)

I am totally against people breaking the law let alone committing murder, but we have to act humane and not lower ourselves down to their standards - surely the person who ends murderer's life is also a murderer?