CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic


RSS Dashosphe

Reward Points:20
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
75%
Arguments:20
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

These people cant wait for 18 years while the family takes care of the autistic fetus. They want taxpayer funds now !

Convince the family to abort it now - and make a quick buck.

Rather the message should be to inform the parents what harmful chemicals that the parents are around - what drugs and lifestyles and how much consumption of alcohol are causing autistic children to be born and make people aware that this is also a genetic condition that can be passed down in their genes.

0 points

Is it ok to abort a prostitute or a homosexual prostitute or a needle-sharing drug addict - if they have aids ?

or do we simply sit back and just listen to the thousands of voices that are so sure that a cure awaits in the next stack of billion-dollar bills ?

You never know what challenges an autistic individual can overcome.

The Democrat, Liberal, Socialists look through the lense of dollar bills to determine who is innocent and valuable. The greener the view, the more innocent and more valuable is the human.

2 points

These people are evil, demonic and demented, they simply look for excuses to be who they truly are.

2 points

I truly feel sorrow for the late-term little innocent baby who is murdered and killed in such a painful way. I can accept that early term abortion is not as painful and the baby does not feel the pain and hurt as intensely and painfully as a baby in late-term.

I have no ill will for women who want rights concerning their own bodies - but - it is the Pro-Choice men and women who want the right to control the bodies of the taxpayers to fund their sexual pleasures, delights and sexual gratifications.

And the taxpayers have spoken - when they elected Donald Trump - we are not interested in financially being involved in the bedtime affairs of others. Especially when they are irresponsible and only using late - term abortion as a method of birth control.

This is our hard earned money and if someone wishes to drag me into their sex life - by seizing monies and funds and earnings from my bank account to fund their sexual gratifications. This is not pro-choice it is theft, irresponsibility and socialism, liberalism and Democrat party violence. Because I choose for You to not have irresponsible sex. I choose for You to wait to have sex and save your money, find a responsible mate and have a family or act responsibly. THIS MY MONEY - MY CHOICE.

I am not interested in being financially involved in your sexual gratifications and your bed - time experiences.

And we care about late-term babies and do not want to fund their murder, torture and horribly painful deaths. Our goals to spend our hard-earned money to fund families and responsible mothers and fathers, this what we seek.

What someone does in their own bed is not my problem or business- until they demand that I become a part / a participant in financially funding their gratifications with no responsibility, no limits, and nothing but unlimited highly expensive abortions being used for nothing more than birth control. it is the most costly method that exists.

Save your money and fund your own bed - time experiences, pleasures, and adventures.. this is the real - Pro - Choice.

My bank account was not set up for you to have sex.

I love babies more than anything in life. They are the most precious and sacred thing in the universe.

dashosphe(20) Clarified
1 point

We can look to the Hadith and see more about exactly what Mohammud was attempting to do in Mecca. Mohammud's problems began when he goes about promising specific Meccaans " A POSITION of RULERSHIP " over the other people in Mecca.

Here, Mohammud is attempting to take over and use bribery and promises of power and control to individuals he wishes to join him and his new companions.

Muhammad also threatens them with punishment if they refuse to accept Islam.

Ibn Humayd- Salamah- Muhammad b. Ishaq- Yazid b. Ziyad- Muhammad b. Ka‘b al-Qurazi:

They gathered against him, and among them was Abu Jahl b. Hisham, who said, while they were waiting at his door, "Muhammad claims that if you follow him in his religion, you shall be the kings of the Arabs and the non-Arabs, that after your death you shall be brought back to life and your lot shall then be gardens like the gardens of Jordan. He also claims that if you do not do this, you shall meet with slaughter after him, and that after death you shall be brought back to life, and your lot shall then be a fire, in which you shall burn."…

(Al-Tabari, pp. 142-143;

Also as Mohammud is going around threatening people with VIOLENCE - slaughter and hellfire and PUNISHMENTS,

Also a violent attack was committed against Abu Jahl - by Mohammmuds Muslim uncle Hamzah.

Hamzah felt that Abu Jahl deserved to be hit in the head and the blow split his forehead open.

It is true that Abu Jahl had insulted Mohammud and played a joke on him by placing a handful of camel guts on Mohammuds shoulders while Mohammud was kneeling and praying.

Ishaq:131

Hamzah came with his bow slung over his shoulder. He was a great hunter, the strongest man of the Quraysh. A woman rose up and said, ‘If only you had seen what your nephew Muhammad had to endure just now before you came. Abu Jahl spoke to him offensively. Hamzah was carried away by a fury, as it was Allah's will to honor him this way.

He { Hamzah } went off quickly, not stopping to speak to anyone. Instead of circumambulating the Ka'aba, he was ready to attack Abu Jahl when he saw him. When he entered the mosque, he saw him sitting among the people. Hamzah raised his bow and gave Abu Jahl a blow which split his head open in an ugly way. He said, ‘Do you insult him when I am a member of his religion? Hit me back if you can.'

It is true The Meccans were verbally insulting and pushing the Muslims around and doing insulting acts against them because of the fact that Mohammud had been threatening them with threats of SLAUGHTER, punishments, and suffering. Mohammud also was going around trying to recruit men in Mecca to join him and telling them that if they follow him in his religion, they shall be the kings of the Arabs.

Afterwards, the Meccan's did insult the Muslims and did push them around and force them away from the Kaaba. But the Muslims began to attack and physically assault the Meccans.

Mohamad was attempting to disrupt the business in Mecca.

Mohammud was attempting to recruit men in Mecca to join him and telling them that if they follow him in his religion, they shall be the kings of the Arabs.

Mohammud was threatening the Meccan's with SLAUGHTER and punishment and threatening them that they would burn in HELL FIRE. And threatening that if they did not join him, the result would be VIOLENCE and bloodshed.

So, it is very clear why the Meccan's forced him out.

The Meccan's were defending themselves. However, Mohammud always turned to violence and cruelty and acted out the threats he made against the Meccan's for not joining him in his religion.

A raiding party led by Zaid b. Harithah set out against Umm Qirfah in the month of Ramadan.

During it, Umm Qirfah (Fatimah bt. Rabi‘ah b. Badr) suffered a cruel death. He tied her legs with rope and then tied her between two camels until they split her in two. She was a very old woman.

This is the Islam that conquered a city called Mecca that were simply defending themselves.

This is exactly why they kicked him out, - because he was trying to destroy their business and threatening slaughter, violence and warfare - with an afterlife that he threatened them that they would be punished with torture and burning in fire.

The Meccan's expressed panic and alarm - that Mohammud threatened - that if you do not JOIN HIM , you shall meet with slaughter

This was exactly why they drove him out.

1 point

what really happened. if someone reads the history and studies - they can find out ?

1 point

I am not a Muslim. But why ?

I do not believe that The God of Abraham had established a covenant with Ishmael and his seed.

Also, I do not believe that Mohammad was a descendant of Ishmael or that there were any descendants of Ishmael alive and living at the time when Mohammad lived - or even alive today.

I believe that Islam is entirely based upon faith with no evidence. Mohammad's entire message, claims and faith was all nothing more than " revelation " - " prophecy " and Spiritual Claims, based on the messages that he received from an unseen force of a spiritual force.

As the Muslims treated and behaved toward the entire Pre - Islamic Pagan World just exactly as they did with the Torah and The Gospels. In other words they treated both the holy Scriptures and also the Pre Islamic Pagan World - in exactly in the same manner. The Muslims destroyed and simply did not preserve any of the Torah and Gospels and also - did not preserve any Pre Islamic data of the world of pagan traditions, faiths, Pagan deities and Pagan.

Islam treated the entire Pre Islamic world - just exactly as they treated - the entire Gospels and the entire Torah. - that have all been destroyed and have not been preserved in Islam. It was non Islamic sources, civilizations and communities outside of Islam that has given us details of the Pre Islamic world and that has preserved and made copies of the Torah and Gospels.

The Prophet Muhammad created an army of forty male followers who acted as an army or military who manipulated and organized against others around them and when it turned violent Mohammad attacked His fellow Arabian people by destroying 360 idols that were kept inside the Kaaba in Mecca. Mohammad violently smashed every single last Idol that they had and destroyed their livelihood and entrepreneurship and completely broke their economy and hit them with the most devastating blow that He possibly could.

He destroyed their lives, property and destroyed their reputation, HISTORICAL ARTIFACTS and temple gods and He wrecked their entire business system, throwing the entire region into a heated violent and savage conflict of a bloodbath. From there onward the Arabians who tried to disband and break apart His terrorist activities were met with death and were murdered by the thousands for trying to gain back all that they had lost. Their entire lives and business and livelihood and entrepreneurship and way of making a living were completely destroyed - yet Muslims insist that Mohammad was defending himself the whole time and that He was the one who was being attacked firstly.

I just look to very single claim made by Muslims and I see no evidence or truth in these claims.

There is no comparison to the claims of Islam and the Quran and even to Mohammad. Mohammad simply has no genealogies that trace him back to Ishmael and Abraham. Everything Mohammad claims is based on the claims of Prophecy, Revelation and Spiritual Inspiration.

We can look to the Hadith and see more about exactly what Mohammud was attempting to do in Mecca. Mohammud's problems began when he goes about promising specific Meccaans " A POSITION of RULERSHIP " over the other people in Mecca.

Here, Mohammud is attempting to take over and use bribery and promises of power and control to individuals he wishes to join him and his new companions.

Muhammad also threatens them with punishment if they refuse to accept Islam.

Ibn Humayd- Salamah- Muhammad b. Ishaq- Yazid b. Ziyad- Muhammad b. Ka‘b al-Qurazi:

They gathered against him, and among them was Abu Jahl b. Hisham, who said, while they were waiting at his door, "Muhammad claims that if you follow him in his religion, you shall be the kings of the Arabs and the non-Arabs, that after your death you shall be brought back to life and your lot shall then be gardens like the gardens of Jordan. He also claims that if you do not do this, you shall meet with slaughter after him, and that after death you shall be brought back to life, and your lot shall then be a fire, in which you shall burn."…

(Al-Tabari, pp. 142-143;

Also as Mohammud is going around threatening people with VIOLENCE - slaughter and hellfire and PUNISHMENTS,

Also a violent attack was committed against Abu Jahl - by Mohammmuds Muslim uncle Hamzah.

Hamzah felt that Abu Jahl deserved to be hit in the head and the blow split his forehead open.

It is true that Abu Jahl had insulted Mohammud and played a joke on him by placing a handful of camel guts on Mohammuds shoulders while Mohammud was kneeling and praying.

Ishaq:131

Hamzah came with his bow slung over his shoulder. He was a great hunter, the strongest man of the Quraysh. A woman rose up and said, ‘If only you had seen what your nephew Muhammad had to endure just now before you came. Abu Jahl spoke to him offensively. Hamzah was carried away by a fury, as it was Allah's will to honor him this way.

He { Hamzah } went off quickly, not stopping to speak to anyone. Instead of circumambulating the Ka'aba, he was ready to attack Abu Jahl when he saw him. When he entered the mosque, he saw him sitting among the people. Hamzah raised his bow and gave Abu Jahl a blow which split his head open in an ugly way. He said, ‘Do you insult him when I am a member of his religion? Hit me back if you can.'

It is true The Meccans were verbally insulting and pushing the Muslims around and doing insulting acts against them because of the fact that Mohammud had been threatening them with threats of SLAUGHTER, punishments, and suffering. Mohammud also was going around trying to recruit men in Mecca to join him and telling them that if they follow him in his religion, they shall be the kings of the Arabs.

Afterwards, the Meccan's did insult the Muslims and did push them around and force them away from the Kaaba. But the Muslims began to attack and physically assault the Meccans.

Mohamad was attempting to disrupt the business in Mecca.

Mohammud was attempting to recruit men in Mecca to join him and telling them that if they follow him in his religion, they shall be the kings of the Arabs.

Mohammud was threatening the Meccan's with SLAUGHTER and punishment and threatening them that they would burn in HELL FIRE. And threatening that if they did not join him, the result would be VIOLENCE and bloodshed.

So, it is very clear why the Meccan's forced him out.

The Meccan's were defending themselves. However, Mohammud always turned to violence and cruelty and acted out the threats he made against the Meccan's for not joining him in his religion.

A raiding party led by Zaid b. Harithah set out against Umm Qirfah in the month of Ramadan.

During it, Umm Qirfah (Fatimah bt. Rabi‘ah b. Badr) suffered a cruel death. He tied her legs with rope and then tied her between two camels until they split her in two. She was a very old woman.

This is the Islam that conquered a city called Mecca that were simply defending themselves.

This is exactly why they kicked him out, - because he was trying to destroy their business and threatening slaughter, violence and warfare - with an afterlife that he threatened them that they would be punished with torture and burning in fire.

The Meccan's expressed panic and alarm - that Mohammud threatened - that if you do not JOIN HIM , you shall meet with slaughter

This was exactly why they drove him out.

1 point

I do not know what to say, I see that the average Roman Catholic would not want to suggest a person be a homosexual nor encourage a woman to go have an abortion. But the majority of Roman Catholic always join hands with the homosexual community and also with the Pro-Abortion community in the voting booth.

They always vote in a majority with the homosexuals and abortionists and work with them to elect politicians who make Laws to fund all forms of abortion - ( EVEN LATE TERM ABORTION ) and the politicians that the majority of Catholics VOTE into office - - the Liberal Democrat Socialist Politicians who demand that gays receive tax breaks for married union - - Same-Sex Marriages...

Today, The Pope Francis is " COMPARING THE ENTIRE SUBJECT OF ABORTION " -

= : TO TRUMP'S IMMIGRATION POLICY ... https://psmag.com/news/did-pope-francis-just-compare-abortion-to-trumps-immigration-policy

The Pope compares Trump’s position to the same acts of the abortionists. In other words, ( * - - unless Trump opens the borders and allows anyone to come into The USA and allows people who illegally entered the country to stay here – while people are still legally waiting in line to come here – then trump is the same evil as an infant killer and a baby killer. - Does this sound like selective morality ? - especially when the Pope never said a single word about Oboma's abortion policy. ?

1 point

Please explain - in what way does the Bible show that God commanded anyone to kill or persecute another who leaves the religious practices or traditions of the Hebrew religion ?

I understand that you may have been told this - and many uninformed people may even believe this - but this is nowhere found in any part of the Bible. And I have been studying the Bible for many, many years. I just have not found any of this.

Please help me to understand why you believe this. Respectfully and sincerely.

1 point

Does anyone know anything about Trump working behind the scenes to help Mexico ?

If so, this could actually be a good outcome, if he can keep the American politics out - that have been financially supporting the failings and eternal problems of Mexico’s society for the last 200 years.

And obviously, it has not just been bad aspects of American politics that have been causing or creating the problems in Mexico - but -

what if Trump found a way to build a wall to protect Americans and to protect the millions of people who have gone through the legal immigration process and signed up to legally enter the country. _ No one cares about these people ? The democrat party pushes aside - the people who are legally waiting in line, who are taking the legal path to citizenship, and they tear down the gates for ( only ) the first and closest ranting and obvious crowd that they see on the horizon - who they know for certain - are people, who will always vote for their programs and politicians.

Is this legal or something good for the USA election system ?

Dashosphe has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here