Past the extent of an age requirement, background check, and required license there is no other form of regulation that the STATE government has much less the federal government. The right to bear arms simply put means that if one chooses to own a gun they can under the Constitution as long as they are of age. And there is no necessary or proper cause that would call for such a law to be enacted to really and truly restrict guns.

If women are taking the pill then they are understanding that they will potentially be having sexual intercourse in the near future. Birth control options that could stop conception and take the biological debate out of it could be an IUD or a shot. It makes the conception argument invalid because then conception would not be a point to make.

Those are all good points but whose to say the opposite. It's not worth the risk of ending a life just to assume that it will go on to live one of crime and suffering.

Religious beliefs is just a moral stand point of certain issues but is not the singular point in which I do not back abortion. There are cases of sexually assaulted children but there are also cases in which those babies go to live perfectly normal lives. Women have several rights but understanding it is another's rights that are potentially being violated as well.

So hypothetically if you went and asked if all of those children in foster care would rather be dead then alive they would state they would rather be dead. While this may be true for very little most would likely cling on to the idea that something good will happen to them one day. There are non profit organizations that are made from the improvement of children's lives who are in foster care. And understanding that mental health is a big point of today's society, there are several outlets children can reach to potentially get through their struggles and I understand it simply does not vanish but if killing them from the start is the solution then I simply will not back that idea. It is just the ethics I have set for myself.

I am not sure how people do end up doing it but the concept of killing something that could have such potential would not sit right with me. Something I couldn’t comprehend. Even if you yourself cannot care for the baby there are people in the world who can and he/she deserves a chance to make the best of their life not see it end before it starts. 135,000 children are adopted each year so 99.999% of the time there is always a better option than death. Having this ability to create precious life is not something that everyone has and as a firm believer in the bible I simply could not agree with any of the circumstances in which it would be okay to end a life because you simply don’t want to have to deal with it or claim to not financially afford it. I understand the rape point of view and it is a terrible thing that happens to women but what good does it do to end another life because of it. In my viewpoint, and this may seem harsh, but abortion is on the same level as murder no matter what argument you try to make on it, the woman is still deciding to give up and let get destroyed something that could potentially go on to be the next athletic star or rocket scientist. The baby should be considered a person from the first point it is conceived and should deserve equal protection under the law. Furthermore I would ponder the question to think about if the baby makes your life better in the end? Look at the glass half full.

Gay marriage should be held to a state power. If people wanted something to become legal then it should be handled on the state level where the population is represented not just what the federal governments says and it goes. Christian majority states should be better represented and by using federal power takes those states representation away.

This could not be more true, I believe you are so right both are gross and I believe watching the man who ate mcdonalds for 30 straight days would have a worse result if he were to do the same thing with taco bell

Although Taco Bell is much more tasty than McDonald's, I believe swimming in a McDonald's dumpster is much more sensible than swimming in a Taco Bell dumpster because McDonald's mostly provides hard foods such as burgers/ nuggets while Taco Bell is a lot of messy meats and sour cream. To add insult to injury, swimming in Taco Bell's dumpster would most likely leave a person with a worse than normal stomach ache.