CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Deb8r

Reward Points:8
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:3
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
3 most recent arguments.
1 point

Thank you! Took the words right out of my head. If only more people had our views.

1 point

Hello Melanie. For future reference, I implore you: list some examples quoted from a reliable source or a personal experience you have had.

1 point

First of all, I would like to point out that by asking "If God doesn't exist, where did we come from?" you are simply adding another step to the answer to the classic question "how did we get here." Science is in the process of discovering the origins of our universe (although I suspect we may never fully understand it). In response to your question, I have one thing to ask: where did your God come from? You argue that the universe could not have been created without a God, yet this still leaves the question of where God came from. You refuse to believe that the universe itself could have began without "divine intervention" but you seem to have no problem with accepting the fact that God was just always there; end of story.

Another point I would like to make is that you made no reference to where you got your probability argument from. If you want me to take you seriously don't just quote a number you found on AnswersInGenesis.com and use a reputable source.

Furthermore, your argument concerning Newton's First Law of Motion is, in my opinion, irrelevant and redundant. If you were to correctly employ logic in your reasoning, you basically argue that nothing should exist, because, using your logic (" it is impossible by the laws of nature for the world to have come into being without some sort of triggering force") then the existence of God is unreasonable as well. That is, of course, unless you have "faith."

Now, about your next argument. You state "who on earth are you, a human being, to question what God does? God is omnipotent and therefore knows exactly what to do, when to do it, and why to do it, while until the end of his life a human can live in denial of basic facts." Unfortunately this is not a live debate, so I will give you something to think about instead of respond to immediately. How do you know all of this? Perhaps the question we should be asking is who are you to assume that God is all of those things? It seems that religious people are rather skilled at knowing exactly what God wants, despite the fact that according to you he is an infinitely more advanced and omnipotent being. And, all of this is based on a few religious books such as the Qu'ran and the Bible ,which have both been translated and rewritten hundreds of times over thousands of years. Does that sound like a reliable source of information to you? You also state that " while until the end of his life a human can live in denial of basic facts." I would like to point out that religious people are infamous of doing this; they deny things science has proven and simply state "we must have faith."

In response to your point that you said is irrelevant to the debate, I agree for the most part. People can find enlightenment and comfort through religion and I am in no way saying that it is evil or useless. it is just that my morals lie in the truth, logic and the furthering of human knowledge, which religion (in my opinion) does nothing to propagate.

Finally, I hope that you find the time to reply to my reply (lol) and thank you for the book recommendation. I am curious as to the other side of the argument and like to see what my "opponents" believe and think in order to have more empathy and understanding. (Instead of just butting heads on the topic endlessly).

Thank you

By the way, if I would have to guess, I'd say that you belong to Christianity as you referred to God as "God" and not "Allah." Also, you may live in the Caribbean as your profile picture may suggest, and I know that the Caribbean is rife with Christianity.


Winning Position: Atheism is the better view

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here