not banned.

- More often than not children are being removed from an ugly environment (starvation, civil war etc)

- Gives children the chance to be brought up in an environment with more money etc

- Allows them access to a different culture

- orphans with no family can have a healhy family

- its good for women who couldnt get pregnent and could not find a baby in their own country.

so it should not be banned

No it should not be banned to adopt children overseas.

Different couples have different motives. In some, it is an act of charity. It is a way of helping a suffering people. Media coverage of the harrowing conditions in Romanian orphanages more than a decade ago broke hearts and opened wallets, kicking off the international adoption bonanza. It is estimated 30 000 Romanian orphans were adopted abroad in the 10 years to 2005.

Other couples are driven by the desire for a baby, and babies are in short supply in the west. The average age of the children available for adoption in the UK is four years and two months. By the time they get to this age they will likely have experienced the breakdown of their natural family and been through several foster families. They may be emotionally damaged or physically disabled - not the innocent, unformed babies of whom parents dream.

Half of the 300 adopted by UK parents each year are from China, where the one-child-per-family policy has resulted in orphanages filled with abandoned children, mostly girls. In the poorer countries of Asia and Africa, many families struggle to feed their children, and some accept that the best chance for their children is to find a better-off family.

So it should not be banned to adopt children overseas

this change comes in child age so children dont know what it right and what is wrong for them.. so they violate the law of god to marry the same sex.

gay marriage is not the right option becuase it affects the future generation.