that is just it, zombee.....

throughout many posts on www.golivewire.com girls have indicated they are kind of grossed out by it and do not see the point.

but they are being subjected to it by their boyfriends, or are being pressured to engage in it.

btw, i have been on that site because i was frustrated by the incredible lack of proper information and .

most of the newsphotographs that have had universal impact through their dramatic edge were b/w

colour is great for family snapshots

wtf is the point....you fuck, then you pull your cock out of her pussy and shoot all over her face? and you call that "making love"?

MAN created god, not the other way around.

we needed to have a power greater than we could possibly have on earth to deal with a whole range of subjects - initially, like thunder, lightning, droughts etc - but also to deal with reward and punishment as MAN came face to face with his own foibles and shortcomings.

we (MAN) cannot come up with a punishment, for example that matches our outrage at a misdeed, so we invent a being outside our realm that will mete out the eternal punishment.

likewise, we must have a place where we will once again meet our loved ones (dealing with death).

in closing: god did not create MAN, men created god

circumcision is not about the reduction of infections, including hiv.

nor has it got anything to do with being "clean"

circumcision was introduced in north america to combat masturbation and to reduce sexual activity in general, since it was thought that reduced pleasure would translate into reduced "horniness"

all the "health benefits" arguments are bogus and are actually dangerous as they might give a person a false sense of security (" i am circumcised, therefore i do not need any other protection")

so many people have been duped by tjose who profess to "serve the lord"

now, once all this has been settled, let's talk about sexual hygene:

wash before you have sex (lint, etc)

you want a bj from your partner?

shake and wipe is my motto.

and you want some interesting foreplay?

just lie there and pull that skin back and expose that delicious gleaming cockhead, taut, brightred to purple-blue

and love your son that hasn't been born yet: do not mutilate him, even if you have been

auntichrist: hygene, hygene, hygene.

the infection argument is so bogus; it's just there to make the guys who have been mutilated feel not so bad about it.

the jesus freaks had a "good" one for that as well: the discarded skin would be used to help burn victims grow new skin!!!??

oh, then there are the africans who have been mutilated as adults and suddenly the hiv/aids incidence went down...well, duh....they are having less sex !

if all parties understand that the act of posing naked and the act of rendering the naked human form have a sexual quality, i do not see anything objectionable in the act of a 14-year old boy posing naked for "art"......however, art has very little to do with it.

the art studio is a very sexually charged environment when a naked human being is being rendered by one or more clothed people.

moreover, the likelihood of the 14-year old boy getting an erection during this process is, like, 100%.

check out my blog (i am an older male posing naked for "art")

the act of posing naked for others to render your body is in and of itself a sexually loaded act.

the act of rendering the naked human is in and of itself a sexually loaded act

drawing hte genitals/breasts is like "touching them/fantasizing about them"

check out my blog at www.themodelundraped.blogspot.com