Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
Perhaps if you help the poorer nations, and the poverty-stricken individuals, then we would advance, not regress. Consider how many individuals there are in 3rd world countries whose potential remains unexhausted. Consider the good they could do for humanity, and in turn for our society, if they were only given the opportunity?
Is it really in human nature for those who have more to give to others that are poor? Aren't we inherently selfish? Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that those who have more receive increased social pressure to donate to charities and such. If it really was in human nature then these billionaires, and even millionaires, would be giving away much more than they actually are - instead some even choose to amass so much wealth that it is impossible for them to spend that amount in their lifetime.
I think that those who have less might actually be more likely to donate - they are the ones who understand what it's like to just get by, or to lack the basics. People who have heaps may, at times, be somewhat detached from the rest of humanity - it's harder to empathise with those that you cannot relate to.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |