CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Ezekiel_roma

Reward Points:526
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
97%
Arguments:352
Debates:41
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.

It would be a better argument if you just stated reasons why abortion does not have detrimental effects on the human body since that is my argument in the first place. Disputing and stating errors on websites would stray far from the topic of the debate.

Source 2 does not over-extend any conclusions. Would you kindly give statement saying such over-extension? We can conclude from the given data since it has been proven through statistics and trends in the research.

As for source 3, you should consider analyzing the argument rather than simply looking for sources since from the statements of the website itself can their points be assessed. Again I am also not responsible for the errors of the websites since I am more focused on the scientific effects of abortion to the body rather than looking for citations.

You have only stated the errors in the sources rather than the arguments present. I am not the one who created the website therefore I am not liable for its errors.

Source 1 has stated numerous side effects and it also has been cited by a physician. "NOTE: Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop and the Physician’s Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth stated in 1996 that this type of procedure “… is never medically necessary to protect a mother’s health or her future fertility. On the contrary, this procedure can pose a significant threat to both.”

Source: ProtectTexas, Texas Department of Health, 2003

When the child is ready to make his own choices, then he can just simply change his beliefs and leave the religion. Teaching an ideology to a child is`t necessarily forcing it to them but rather a form of introduction.

Children are too young to comprehend such beliefs even if they are taught by their parent. A 3 year old child for an example would find it difficult to comprehend the such concepts thus it would only be a burden to both parties if explained.

I believe that is already part of the system in a religion. As mere individuals in a family we can only do so much as to prevent or assert these influences in our child. Probably when the child gets older then he may dispute such authority from his parents. Children are too young to understand such doctrines anyway and not realize such kind of abuse until they grow of age.

Yes since well give power to a lunatic? What is this world war 2 again?

No since it has causes detrimental risks to the mother and the child. It also has a respectable failure rate causing unplanned deaths.

Wisdom since knowledge is useless unless you know where and when to use it.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Love
Winning Position: Cause of Atheism
Winning Position: Impossible
Winning Position: What will be your last words when you die?
Winning Position: Unresolved
Winning Position: If you had one wish from the government, what would it be?

About Me


"Intellectuals debate. Idiots argue."

Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Age: 24
Marital Status: In a Relationship
Political Party: Republican
Country: Philippines
Religion: Catholic

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here