This question is a question we got in school. We discussed it and we said that revolution is necessary when change is needed. Or when things get a bit outdated. At first we only thought of revolution as: The American Revolution and The French Revolution, where there was a lot of blood, death and war. But then our teacher reminded us of the other revolutions. So now, I am reminding you all of the good revolutions, just in case you were only thinking of the revolutions up above.

Examples of somewhat good revolutions:

Industrial Revolution

Technological Revolution

The reason why you think that gays get special treatment is because always on the news. The reason why they're always on the news is because there are CHILDREN HURTING AND/OR KILLING themselves because they are not accepted by their own PARENTS. All because they like the same gender.

Being able to marry is not "special treatment", it's being able to do what other couples that are in love do, get married. Would you like to know what special treatment is? That would be not paying taxes.

Do we really need all married couples to have a child? Because, I'm pretty sure that its alright if a few married couples, or rather couples in general can't produce a child. We have many children on Earth, many people. Back then that would be somewhat of a valid argument because there weren't too many people, but now it isn't very valid because we're kind of over populated. It's not like if we legalize marriage of the LGBT community, then all the humans will start having sex with the same sex and no more children will be created leading to the extinction of the human race, its just more breathing space for the LGBT community.

Ya know, I have a perfect pun for this. Confucius, I mean no harm to you and your ideas, I think you are very intelligent and clever, please forgive me for this pun... Confucius was Confused.

There are many animals that when they find a partner, they stay with that partner for the rest of their life, and in some instances, the partner they find is actually of the same sex. Also, there are animals that stay with on partner their whole life, but only have sex with the other sex to produce offspring. And by animals, are you referring to all animals, because never forget, humans are animals too, which means, we humans also hump anything that moves? I don't believe so, unless you do, which by all means go ahead, I won't judge.

Polygamy is indeed not legal in most states but so is owning a monkey. But there are still people who believe in polygamy, and there are religions that practice polygamy.

I must ask, how are we hypocrites? This is a debate on homosexuals and the such, not on if polygamy should be legal in all states, that subject can be on another debate, but at the moment not here. But, I thank you for giving me another idea for a separate debate.

Yes, but sir, with work, you are paid. With school we work but don't get paid. I'm not saying that its hard or anything, or that children have it worse than adults or that working is easier than school, I'm just saying is there a way to improve our education system where the children are more comfortable. Also, I am not saying that the education system is not needed, I know the benefits of it, wouldn't want the middle ages to happen again, do we? I as a student, don't really find it that hard to go to school, but that's probably because the teachers here at the town I live in, are amazing.

If the reason why homosexuals should not be granted marriage because they can't produce children, and the reason why wild animals mate is to produce offspring, then why are there cases of homosexuality in wild animals, whose usually only reason to mate is to have offspring? And not all men and women want children, should those type of people not be able to marry as well?

Actually it would be a brilliant idea for two men to raise a child that came from another woman. Isn't that what adopting basically is? Isn't adopting basically two people raising a child together, even though the child didn't come from them? The child was put in the adoption center because the woman that gave birth to it couldn't raise it, and it's wrong for two men to step in and raise the child that a woman can't? And if it was a couple that put the child for adoption then it's wrong for a homosexual couple to raise the child that the couple, probably straight, couldn't raise?

"It used to be that psychologists did not consider homosexuality a normal natural thing." Well, homosexuality is actually very natural. It can be found in over 1500 of the species we know of on Earth. Many animals like chimps, dolphins, giraffes and so on engage in homosexual and bisexual acts. And there are instances of homosexual animals raising young in the wild and in captivity.

"Do you want a man having 20 wives?"

Well, if you think about it, there are many people who marry multiple people. There are religions that allow their people to marry multiple people. It's called polygamy.

Well, if you think about it, this generation has become more accepting. The only reason a child would get made fun of for having parents of the same sex, is if that child was raised in an environment where the parents make fun of children that have parents of the same sex. It would be how the parents of the other children raise them, that would cause the child to either accept the fact that the child has parents of the same sex, or to reject and make fun of the child for having parents of the same sex. And anyway, bullies just find your weaknesses, it can be literally anything, having too much hair, being too fat and so on.